The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
THE EFFECTS OF PHYSICAL ATTRACTIVENESS ON JOB‐RELATED OUTCOMES: A META‐ANALYSIS OF EXPERIMENTAL STUDIES
Open accessAbstract
We report the findings of a meta‐analytic review of experimental studies concerned with the biasing effect of physical attractiveness on a variety of job‐related outcomes. In support of implicit personality theory, attractive individuals were found to fare better than unattractive individuals in terms of a number of such outcomes. The weighted mean effect size, d, was .37 for all studies. In addition, tests for moderating effects showed that (a) the attractiveness bias did not differ between studies that provided low versus high amounts of job‐relevant information about the targets, (b) the same bias was greater for within‐subjects research designs than for between‐subjects designs, (c) professionals were as susceptible to the bias as were college students, (d) attractiveness was as important for men as for women, and (e) the biasing effect of attractiveness has decreased in recent years. Implications of these findings are considered.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Dion, K., Berscheid, E., & Walster, E. (1972) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/h0033731 · Cited by 3,865
Maxims or myths of beauty? A meta-analytic and theoretical review
Langlois, J. H., Kalakanis, L., Rubenstein, A. J., Larson, A., Hallam, M., & Smoot, M. (2000) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.126.3.390 · Cited by 2,429
Eagly, A. H., Ashmore, R. D., Makhijani, M. G., & Longo, L. C. (1991) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.110.1.109 · Cited by 1,875
Cited by
Experimental research on labor market discrimination
Neumark, D. (2018) · Journal of Economic Literature · doi:10.1257/jel.20161309 · Cited by 529
Neural and behavioral responses to attractiveness in adult and infant faces
Hahn, A. C., & Perrett, D. I. (2014) · Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.neubiorev.2014.08.015 · Cited by 167
Madera, J. M., & Hebl, M. R. (2012) · Journal of Applied Psychology · doi:10.1037/a0025799 · Cited by 134
Meißner, M., & Oll, J. (2019) · Organizational Research Methods · doi:10.1177/1094428117744882 · Cited by 131
Derous, E., Nguyen, H.-H., & Ryan, A. M. (2009) · Human Performance · doi:10.1080/08959280903120261 · Cited by 91
Metadata
- Authors
- HOSODA, M., STONE‐ROMERO, E. F., & COATS, G.
- Venue
- Personnel Psychology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2003-06
- Volume
- 56
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 431-462
- ISSN
- 0031-5826 (ISSN-L)
- 1744-6570
- OpenAlex
- W2092205708
- Cited by
- 622
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 24.41
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
