The DOI matches its Crossref record.
A comparison of some quantitative methods of extracting small vermiform nematodes from soil
Abstract
SUMMARY: When 200 ml. dispersed soil is sedimented from an obliquely rising water current in a simple compartmented tank about three‐quarters of the nematodes are extracted. About 95% of the nematodes in the concentrated suspension can be separated finally from mineral and heavy organic particles by centrifugal notation. When mobile nematodes were finally separated from soil particles by paper tissue, this sedimentation method extracted as many nematodes from sand and loam as Seinhorst's two‐flask and elutriation methods, but in one test extracted fewer Tylenchorhynchus from clay and in another fewer Paratylenchus from clay than the elutriation method. The method is quicker (4 or 6 instead of 30–45 min.) and easier. Mobile nematodes can be extracted from 300 ml. soil spread out on paper tissue in 23. 33 cm. trays of 8 mesh/cm. phosphor‐bronze gauze, just resting on shallow water. The suspension obtained after 24 hr. at 16–18°C. was concentrated to 10–15 ml. without loss by sedimentation in two tapered cylinders, one of 8 cm. bore, the other of 2.6 cm. bore. This method usually extracted significantly more nematodes than the sedimentation, two‐flask and elutriation methods.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Griffiths, B. S., Ritz, K., Bardgett, R. D., Cook, R., Christensen, S., Ekelund, F., Sørensen, S. J., Bååth, E., Bloem, J., De Ruiter, P. C., et al. (2000) · Oikos · doi:10.1034/j.1600-0706.2000.900208.x · Cited by 656
Nematode diversity in agroecosystems
Yeates, G. W., & Bongers, T. (1999) · Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment · doi:10.1016/s0167-8809(99)00033-x · Cited by 508
Phytoecdysteroids: A novel defense against plant-parasitic nematodes
Soriano, I. R., Riley, I. T., Potter, M. J., & Bowers, W. S. (2004) · Journal of Chemical Ecology · doi:10.1023/b:joec.0000045584.56515.11 · Cited by 126
Microbial and microfaunal community structure in cropping systems with genetically modified plants
Griffiths, B. S., Caul, S., Thompson, J., Birch, A. N. E., Cortet, J., Andersen, M. N., & Krogh, P. H. (2007) · Pedobiologia · doi:10.1016/j.pedobi.2007.04.002 · Cited by 74
Metadata
- Authors
- WHITEHEAD, A. G., & HEMMING, J. R.
- Venue
- Annals of Applied Biology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 1965-02
- Volume
- 55
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 25-38
- ISSN
- 0003-4746 (ISSN-L)
- 1744-7348
- OpenAlex
- W2022359093
- Cited by
- 1,405
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 2.57
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A comparison of some quantitative methods of extracting small vermiform nematodes from soil. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1744-7348.1965.tb07864.x
- The paper
- WHITEHEAD, A. G., & HEMMING, J. R. (1965). A comparison of some quantitative methods of extracting small vermiform nematodes from soil. Annals of Applied Biology. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-7348.1965.tb07864.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.