The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Promising eco-physiological traits for genetic improvement of cereal yields in Mediterranean environments
Abstract
Summary Breeding for improved productivity has been tremendously successful in the last half-century, but needs to be even more efficient in the future. Hope based on contributions from molecular biology for improved yield potential seems to depend upon an improved knowledge of yield physiology. This knowledge may assist breeding either directly, recommending selection criteria, or indirectly identifying simpler traits that could be reliably mapped and selected for through marker-assisted selection. Physiological traits associated with improved performance under water-limited conditions, include phenology (that allows the crop to escape stresses) and those associated with improved water use, water use efficiency and partitioning. Undoubtedly, earliness has been the predominant trait improved for under Mediterranean conditions, and may not be a prospective trait for future breeding. Different traits that may confer the ability to the crop for capturing more water, such as deeper root systems or osmotic adjustment, may be unworkable in terms of their direct use in selection and surrogates would be needed. For instance, canopy temperature depression and discrimination against 13 C may be used to assess improved ability to capture water (in these cases yield is positively related to discrimination against 13 C in grains). Early vigour, which allows faster ground coverage, also increases the amount of water actually transpired by the canopy by reducing direct evaporation and presents substantial intraspecific variation, and selection for this trait may be successfully carried out either directly or through the use of vegetation indexes. Improved water use efficiency based on transpiration efficiency is largely restricted to conditions where additional water is not available. A constitutively low stomatal conductance or a high stomatal sensitivity may optimise the transpiration efficiency. In this context, discrimination against 13 C is also a simple and reliable measure of water use efficiency, and in cases in which no major differences in capturing water is possible discrimination against 13 C correlates negatively with yield. Substantial further improvements in partitioning may be limited in most cereals.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Carbon Isotope Discrimination and Photosynthesis
Farquhar, G. D., Ehleringer, J. R., & Hubick, K. T. (1989) · Annual Review of Plant Physiology and Plant Molecular Biology · doi:10.1146/annurev.pp.40.060189.002443 · Cited by 7,063
Plant Breeding for Stress Environments
Blum, A. (2018) · doi:10.1201/9781351075718 · Cited by 1,309 · cited 2×
“A positive relationship has been generally found between canopy temperature depression and yield for different genotypes (Blum, 1988; Blum et al., 1990; Reynolds et al., 1994, 1998; Amani et al., 1996; Fischer et al., 1998; Reynolds & Pfeiffer, 2000), though sometimes it did not work well (e.”
BackgroundPlant breeding and drought in C3 cereals: What should we breed for?
ARAUS, J. L. (2002) · Annals of Botany · doi:10.1093/aob/mcf049 · Cited by 1,243 · cited 7×
“Traits putatively related to yield must positively affect water use, water use efficiency (WUE) or biomass partitioning towards reproductive organs (Passioura, 1977, 1996; Richards, 1996, 2000; Araus et al., 2002b).”
BackgroundInfluentialFischer, R. A., Rees, D., Sayre, K. D., Lu, Z. ‐., Condon, A. G., & Saavedra, A. L. (1998) · Crop Science · doi:10.2135/cropsci1998.0011183x003800060011x · Cited by 887 · cited 1×
“…found between canopy temperature depression and yield for different genotypes (Blum, 1988; Blum et al., 1990; Reynolds et al., 1994, 1998; Amani et al., 1996; Fischer et al., 1998; Reynolds & Pfeiffer, 2000), though sometimes it did not work well (e.g. Villegas et al., 2000; Royo et al., 2002).”
Background
Cited by
Drought tolerance improvement in crop plants: An integrated view from breeding to genomics
Cattivelli, L., Rizza, F., Badeck, F.-W., Mazzucotelli, E., Mastrangelo, A. M., Francia, E., Marè, C., Tondelli, A., & Stanca, A. M. (2008) · Field Crops Research · doi:10.1016/j.fcr.2007.07.004 · Cited by 1,433
Raising yield potential in wheat
Reynolds, M., Foulkes, M. J., Slafer, G. A., Berry, P., Parry, M. A. J., Snape, J. W., & Angus, W. J. (2009) · Journal of Experimental Botany · doi:10.1093/jxb/erp016 · Cited by 675
Self-citationManagement of crop water under drought: a review
Bodner, G., Nakhforoosh, A., & Kaul, H.-P. (2015) · Agronomy for Sustainable Development · doi:10.1007/s13593-015-0283-4 · Cited by 629
Improving water use in crop production
Morison, J. I. L., Baker, N. R., Mullineaux, P. M., & Davies, W. J. (2008) · Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences · doi:10.1098/rstb.2007.2175 · Cited by 606
Phenotyping for drought tolerance of crops in the genomics era
Tuberosa, R. (2012) · Frontiers in Physiology · doi:10.3389/fphys.2012.00347 · Cited by 558
Metadata
- Authors
- SLAFER, G. A., ARAUS, J. L., ROYO, C., & MORAL, L. F. G.
- Venue
- Annals of Applied Biology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2005-01
- Volume
- 146
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 61-70
- ISSN
- 0003-4746 (ISSN-L)
- 1744-7348
- OpenAlex
- W2034452149
- Cited by
- 243
- References
- 4
- FWCI
- 10.71
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Promising eco-physiological traits for genetic improvement of cereal yields in Mediterranean environments. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1744-7348.2005.04048.x
- The paper
- SLAFER, G. A., ARAUS, J. L., ROYO, C., & MORAL, L. F. G. (2005). Promising eco-physiological traits for genetic improvement of cereal yields in Mediterranean environments. Annals of Applied Biology. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-7348.2005.04048.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.