The DOI matches its Crossref record; 11 of the 11 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Management of crop water under drought: a review
Open accessAbstract
Drought is a predominant cause of low yields worldwide. There is an urgent need for more water efficient cropping systems facing large water consumption of irrigated agriculture and high unproductive losses via runoff and evaporation. Identification of yield-limiting constraints in the plant–soil–atmosphere continuum are the key to improved management of plant water stress. Crop ecology provides a systematic approach for this purpose integrating soil hydrology and plant physiology into the context of crop production. We review main climate, soil and plant properties and processes that determine yield in different water-limited environments. From this analysis, management measures for cropping systems under specific drought conditions are derived. Major findings from literature analysis are as follows. (1) Unproductive water losses such as evaporation and runoff increase from continental in-season rainfall climates to storage-dependent winter rainfall climates. Highest losses occur under tropical residual moisture regimes with short intense rainy season. (2) Sites with a climatic dry season require adaptation via phenology and water saving to ensure stable yields. Intermittent droughts can be buffered via the root system, which is still largely underutilised for better stress resistance. (3) At short-term better management options such as mulching and date of seeding allow to adjust cropping systems to site constraints. Adapted cultivars can improve the synchronisation between crop water demand and soil supply. At long term, soil hydraulic and plant physiological constraints can be overcome by changing tillage systems and breeding new varieties with higher stress resistance. (4) Interactions between plant and soil, particularly in the rhizosphere, are a way towards better crop water supply. Targeted management of such plant–soil interactions is still at infancy. We conclude that understanding site-specific stress hydrology is imperative to select the most efficient measures to mitigate stress. Major progress in future can be expected from crop ecology focussing on the management of complex plant (root)–soil interactions.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Organic matter and water-stable aggregates in soils
TISDALL, J. M., & OADES, J. M. (1982) · Journal of Soil Science · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2389.1982.tb01755.x · Cited by 6,267
Persistence of soil organic matter as an ecosystem property
Schmidt, M. W. I., Torn, M. S., Abiven, S., Dittmar, T., Guggenberger, G., Janssens, I. A., Kleber, M., Kögel-Knabner, I., Lehmann, J., Manning, D. A. C., et al. (2011) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature10386 · Cited by 6,057
Soil structure and management: a review
Bronick, C. J., & Lal, R. (2005) · Geoderma · doi:10.1016/j.geoderma.2004.03.005 · Cited by 4,463
Six, J., Bossuyt, H., Degryze, S., & Denef, K. (2004) · Soil and Tillage Research · doi:10.1016/j.still.2004.03.008 · Cited by 4,410
Understanding plant responses to drought—from genes to the whole plant.
Chaves, M. M., Maroco, J. P., & Pereira, J. S. (2003) · Functional Plant Biology · doi:10.1071/fp02076 · Cited by 3,845
Field high-throughput phenotyping: the new crop breeding frontier
Araus, J. L., & Cairns, J. E. (2014) · Trends in Plant Science · doi:10.1016/j.tplants.2013.09.008 · Cited by 1,817 · cited 1×
“Araus and Cairns (2014) reviewed currently available spectral technology and their use for field phenotyping.”
BackgroundSoil invertebrates and ecosystem services
Lavelle, P., Decaëns, T., Aubert, M., Barot, S., Blouin, M., Bureau, F., Margerie, P., Mora, P., & Rossi, J.-P. (2006) · European Journal of Soil Biology · doi:10.1016/j.ejsobi.2006.10.002 · Cited by 1,606
Plant breeding and drought in C3 cereals: What should we breed for?
ARAUS, J. L. (2002) · Annals of Botany · doi:10.1093/aob/mcf049 · Cited by 1,243 · cited 3×
“CID has been assessed for various crops such as C3 cereals (Araus et al. 2002), maize (Gresset et al. 2014), soybean (Gitz et al. 2005), sorghum (Henderson et al. 1998), faba bean (Link et al. 2007) and others.”
BackgroundImpact of plant roots on the resistance of soils to erosion by water: a review
Gyssels, G., Poesen, J., Bochet, E., & Li, Y. (2005) · Progress in Physical Geography: Earth and Environment · doi:10.1191/0309133305pp443ra · Cited by 1,225 · cited 2×
“…are related to the protective canopy effect against aggregate slaking (Zuazo and Pleguezuelo 2008), root/mycorrhiza enmeshment of (macro)aggregates (Gyssels et al. 2005; Kohler-Milleret et al. 2013), more active soil macrofauna (Facelli and Pickett 1991; Lavelle et al. 2006), enhanced microbial…”
BackgroundHarvest index: a review of its use in plant breeding and crop physiology.
HAY, R. K. M. (1995) · Annals of Applied Biology · doi:10.1111/j.1744-7348.1995.tb05015.x · Cited by 686
Cited by
Regulated deficit irrigation for crop production under drought stress. A review
Chai, Q., Gan, Y., Zhao, C., Xu, H.-L., Waskom, R. M., Niu, Y., & Siddique, K. H. M. (2016) · Agronomy for Sustainable Development · doi:10.1007/s13593-015-0338-6 · Cited by 632
Early sowing systems can boost Australian wheat yields despite recent climate change
Hunt, J. R., Lilley, J. M., Trevaskis, B., Flohr, B. M., Peake, A., Fletcher, A., Zwart, A. B., Gobbett, D., & Kirkegaard, J. A. (2019) · Nature Climate Change · doi:10.1038/s41558-019-0417-9 · Cited by 213
Ideas and perspectives: Synergies from co-deployment of negative emission technologies
Amann, T., & Hartmann, J. (2019) · Biogeosciences · doi:10.5194/bg-16-2949-2019 · Cited by 53
Metadata
- Authors
- Bodner, G., Nakhforoosh, A., & Kaul, H.-P.
- Venue
- Agronomy for Sustainable Development
- Published
- 2015-02-04
- Volume
- 35
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 401-442
- ISSN
- 1773-0155 (ISSN-L)
- 1774-0746
- OpenAlex
- W1965040246
- Cited by
- 629
- References
- 11
- FWCI
- 30.04
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Management of crop water under drought: a review. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1007/s13593-015-0283-4
- The paper
- Bodner, G., Nakhforoosh, A., & Kaul, H.-P. (2015). Management of crop water under drought: a review. Agronomy for Sustainable Development. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13593-015-0283-4
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.