The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Changes in Forest Structure and Species Composition during Secondary Forest Succession in the Bolivian Amazon1
Abstract
Changes in forest structure and species diversity throughout secondary succession were studied using a chronosequence at two sites in the Bolivian Amazon. Secondary forests ranging in age from 2 to 40 years as well as mature forests were included, making a total of 14 stands. Fifty plants per forest layer (understory, subcanopy, and canopy) were sampled using the transect of variable area technique. Mean and maximum height, total stem density, basal area, and species number were calculated at the stand level. Species diversity was calculated for each stand and for each combination of forest layer and stand. A correspondence analysis was performed, and the relationship between relative abundance of the species and stand age was modeled using a set of hierarchical models. Canopy height and basal area increased with stand age, indicating that secondary forests rapidly attain a forest structure similar in many respects to mature forests. A total of 250 species were recorded of which ca 50 percent made up 87 percent of the sampled individuals. Species diversity increased with stand age and varied among the forest layers, with the lowest diversity in the canopy. The results of the correspondence analysis indicated that species composition varies with stand age, forest layer, and site. The species composition of mature forests recovered at different rates in the different forest layers, being the slowest in the canopy layer. Species showed different patterns of abundance in relation to stand age, supporting the current model of succession.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Biomass resilience of Neotropical secondary forests
Poorter, L., Bongers, F., Aide, T. M., Almeyda Zambrano, A. M., Balvanera, P., Becknell, J. M., Boukili, V., Brancalion, P. H. S., Broadbent, E. N., Chazdon, R. L., et al. (2016) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature16512 · Cited by 1,210
Self-citationRecovery and resilience of tropical forests after disturbance
Cole, L. E. S., Bhagwat, S. A., & Willis, K. J. (2014) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/ncomms4906 · Cited by 279
Loss of secondary‐forest resilience by land‐use intensification in the Amazon
Jakovac, C. C., Peña‐Claros, M., Kuyper, T. W., & Bongers, F. (2015) · Journal of Ecology · doi:10.1111/1365-2745.12298 · Cited by 267
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Peña‐Claros, M.
- Venue
- Biotropica
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2003-12
- Volume
- 35
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 450-461
- ISSN
- 0006-3606 (ISSN-L)
- 1744-7429
- OpenAlex
- W2140179558
- Cited by
- 228
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 7.17
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Changes in Forest Structure and Species Composition during Secondary Forest Succession in the Bolivian Amazon1. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1744-7429.2003.tb00602.x
- The paper
- Peña‐Claros, M. (2003). Changes in Forest Structure and Species Composition during Secondary Forest Succession in the Bolivian Amazon1. Biotropica. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-7429.2003.tb00602.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.