Loss of secondary‐forest resilience by land‐use intensification in the A mazon
Open accessAbstract
Summary: Understanding how land‐use intensification affects forest resilience is a key for elucidating the mechanisms underlying regeneration processes and for planning more sustainable land‐use systems. Here, we evaluate how the intensification of a swidden cultivation system affects secondary‐forest resilience in the A mazon. Along a gradient of land‐use intensity, we analysed the relative role of management intensity, soil properties and landscape configuration in determining the resilience of early secondary forests ( SF s). We assessed resilience as the recovery level of forest structure and species diversity achieved by SF s 5 years after abandonment. We used as a reference the recovery level achieved by SF s subjected to the lowest intensity of use, given that these SF s are part of a dynamic system and may not develop to old‐growth forests. Therefore, we interpreted a deviation from this reference level as a change in forest resilience. The recovery of forest structure was determined by management intensity, while the recovery of species diversity was driven by landscape configuration. With increasing number of cycles and weeding frequency along with decreasing fallow period and patch area, SF basal area and canopy height decreased, regeneration shifted from a seed‐ to sprout‐dependent strategy, and liana infestation on trees increased. With decreasing area covered by old‐growth forest, species richness and Shannon diversity decreased. Secondary‐forest resilience decreased with land‐use intensification, mainly mediated by the effect of management intensity upon regeneration strategies. Our findings demonstrate the – many times overlooked – importance of previous management intensity in determining the structure of SF s and highlight the importance of regeneration strategy for forest resilience. Synthesis . Swidden cultivation supports people's livelihoods and transforms landscapes in the tropics. The sustainability of this system depends on ecosystem services provided by SF s that develop during the fallow period. Land‐use intensification reduces the resilience of SF s and ultimately may drive the system towards an arrested succession state that holds a lower potential to deliver ecosystem services to the A mazonian people. Under an intensification scenario, the adaptation of management practices is needed to guarantee the resilience of swidden cultivation systems.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In stable forest regions of the Amazon with annual rainfall above 1,800 mm, forest cover usually recovers within a few years or decades after disturbances, yet forest composition and functioning may remain degraded for decades or centuries.
“In stable forest regions of the Amazon with annual rainfall above 1,800 mm (Extended Data Fig. 1b), forest cover usually recovers within a few years or decades after disturbances, yet forest composition and functioning may remain degraded for decades or centuries84–87.”
From Critical transitions in the Amazon forest system (2024) · cites this paper as [86]
Searches for recovery times, rainfall, and species composition found no matching full-text passage. The retrieved text is labelled Abstract and cannot establish the claim under the specified evidence rule; the available passages do not verify recovery within years or decades, an 1,800 mm rainfall threshold, or degradation lasting centuries. (LLM, conf=0.70)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
Resilience, Adaptability and Transformability in Social–ecological Systems
Walker, B., Holling, C. S., Carpenter, S. R., & Kinzig, A. P. (2004) · Ecology and Society · doi:10.5751/es-00650-090205 · Cited by 7,821 · see citing works
Anticipating Critical Transitions
Scheffer, M., Carpenter, S. R., Lenton, T. M., Bascompte, J., Brock, W., Dakos, V., van de Koppel, J., van de Leemput, I. A., Levin, S. A., van Nes, E. H., et al. (2012) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1225244 · Cited by 2,208 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Biomass resilience of Neotropical secondary forests
Poorter, L., Bongers, F., Aide, T. M., Almeyda Zambrano, A. M., Balvanera, P., Becknell, J. M., Boukili, V., Brancalion, P. H. S., Broadbent, E. N., Chazdon, R. L., et al. (2016) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature16512 · Cited by 1,210 · see citing works
Self-citationCritical transitions in the Amazon forest system
Flores, B. M., Montoya, E., Sakschewski, B., Nascimento, N., Staal, A., Betts, R. A., Levis, C., Lapola, D. M., Esquível-Muelbert, A., Jakovac, C., et al. (2024) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-023-06970-0 · Cited by 607 · see citing works
Self-citationFunctional recovery of secondary tropical forests
Poorter, L., Rozendaal, D. M. A., Bongers, F., Almeida, D. J. S., Álvarez, F. S., Andrade, J. L., Arreola Villa, L. F., Becknell, J. M., Bhaskar, R., Boukili, V., et al. (2021) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.2003405118 · Cited by 147 · see citing works
Self-citation
- Authors
- Jakovac, C. C., Peña‐Claros, M., Kuyper, T. W., & Bongers, F.
- Affiliations
- Instituto Nacional de Pesquisas da Amazônia (BR)
- Wageningen University & Research (NL)
- Corresponding author
- Jakovac, Catarina C.
- Venue
- Journal of Ecology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2015-01
- Volume
- 103
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 67-77
- ISSN
- 0022-0477 (ISSN-L)
- 1365-2745
- OpenAlex
- W2133636781
- Cited by
- 267
- References
- 2
- Citations by year
- 2026: 16 · 2025: 17 · 2024: 15 · 2023: 27 · 2022: 27 · 2021: 39 · 2020: 26 · 2019: 30 · 2018: 20 · 2017: 19 · 2016: 24 · 2015: 7
- FWCI
- 21.84
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- research.wur.nl
- Locations
- Journal of Ecology (publishedVersion)
- Socio-Environmental Systems Modeling (acceptedVersion)
- Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- Netherlands Organization for International Cooperation in Higher Education (NFP-PhD.11/ 606)
- Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico (381252/2013-2)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Nature and Landscape Conservation › Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Conservation, Biodiversity, and Resource Management
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Nature and Landscape Conservation › Forest ecology and management
- Keywords
- land use intensification, swidden agriculture, shifting cultivation, forest regeneration, management intensity, landscape configuration, liana infestation, arrested succession, old-growth forest, ecosystem services
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review