The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The Bushmeat Harvest Alters Seedling Banks by Favoring Lianas, Large Seeds, and Seeds Dispersed by Bats, Birds, and Wind
Abstract
We evaluated predictions that hunters favor lianas, large seeds, and seeds dispersed by bats, small birds, and mechanical means for seedling banks in central Panama. We censused 3201 trees in 20 1‐ha plots and 38,250 seedlings in the central 64 m 2 of each plot. We found significant differences in the species composition of the seedling bank between nine protected sites in the Barro Colorado Nature Monument and 11 hunted sites in the contiguous Parque Nacional Soberanía. Lianas, species with large seeds, and species with seeds dispersed by bats, small birds, and mechanical means were all overrepresented at hunted sites. The latter two findings could also be evaluated relative to the species composition of reproductively mature adults for canopy trees. The tree species present in the seedling bank had significantly heavier seeds than the tree species present as adults at hunted sites but not at protected sites. The representation of seed dispersal modes among the species present in the seedling bank did not reflect pre‐existing differences in the local species composition of adults. We hypothesize that hunting large seed predators favors large seeds by reducing predation and increasing survival. We also hypothesize that the harvest of large birds and mammals that disperse many seeds favors other species whose seeds are dispersed by bats, small birds, and mechanical means. This process also favors lianas because the seeds of disproportionate numbers of liana species are dispersed by wind.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Peres, C. A., & Palacios, E. (2007) · Biotropica · doi:10.1111/j.1744-7429.2007.00272.x · Cited by 1,383
Redford, K. H. (1992) · BioScience · doi:10.2307/1311860 · Cited by 1,219
Cited by
Peres, C. A., & Palacios, E. (2007) · Biotropica · doi:10.1111/j.1744-7429.2007.00272.x · Cited by 1,383
Schnitzer, S. A., & Bongers, F. (2011) · Ecology Letters · doi:10.1111/j.1461-0248.2011.01590.x · Cited by 543
Seed Dispersal and Spatial Pattern in Tropical Trees
Seidler, T. G., & Plotkin, J. B. (2006) · PLoS Biology · doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.0040344 · Cited by 532
Defaunation affects carbon storage in tropical forests
Bello, C., Galetti, M., Pizo, M. A., Magnago, L. F. S., Rocha, M. F., Lima, R. A. F., Peres, C. A., Ovaskainen, O., & Jordano, P. (2015) · Science Advances · doi:10.1126/sciadv.1501105 · Cited by 445
The Need to Quantify Ecosystem Services Provided by Birds
Wenny, D. G., DeVault, T. L., Johnson, M. D., Kelly, D., H. Sekercioglu, C., Tomback, D. F., & Whelan, C. J. (2011) · The Auk · doi:10.1525/auk.2011.10248 · Cited by 417
Metadata
- Authors
- Wright, S. J., Hernandéz, A., & Condit, R.
- Venue
- Biotropica
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2007-04-18
- Volume
- 39
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 363-371
- ISSN
- 0006-3606 (ISSN-L)
- 1744-7429
- OpenAlex
- W2157420753
- Cited by
- 219
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 13.36
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The Bushmeat Harvest Alters Seedling Banks by Favoring Lianas, Large Seeds, and Seeds Dispersed by Bats, Birds, and Wind. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1744-7429.2007.00289.x
- The paper
- Wright, S. J., Hernandéz, A., & Condit, R. (2007). The Bushmeat Harvest Alters Seedling Banks by Favoring Lianas, Large Seeds, and Seeds Dispersed by Bats, Birds, and Wind. Biotropica. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-7429.2007.00289.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.