The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Conserving What and for Whom? Why Conservation Should Help Meet Basic Human Needs in the Tropics
Open accessAbstract
For hundreds of millions of people, biodiversity is about eating, staying healthy, and finding shelter. Meeting these people's basic needs should receive greater priority in the conservation agenda. Wild and semi‐wild plants and animals contribute significantly to nutrition, health care, income, and culture in developing countries, and the poorest and most vulnerable people often rely on those resources most. Depleting those resources or making them inaccessible can impoverish these people even further. ‘Pro‐poor conservation’—that is, conservation that aims to support poor people—explicitly seeks to address basic human needs. Such an emphasis has many potential synergies with more conventional conservation goals. Nonetheless, pro‐poor conservation requires a distinct attitude to gauging conservation outcomes and a different approach to conservation science. Biologists can make a vital contribution.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The Struggle to Govern the Commons
Dietz, T., Ostrom, E., & Stern, P. C. (2003) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1091015 · Cited by 4,209
Revisiting the commons: local lessons, global challenges.
Ostrom, E., Burger, J., Field, C. B., Norgaard, R. B., & Policansky, D. (1999) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.284.5412.278 · Cited by 2,798
Evidence for post‐depletion sustainability in a mature bushmeat market
COWLISHAW, G., MENDELSON, S., & ROWCLIFFE, J. M. (2005) · Journal of Applied Ecology · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2664.2005.01046.x · Cited by 206
Cited by
An ecosystem services framework to support both practical conservation and economic development
Tallis, H., Kareiva, P., Marvier, M., & Chang, A. (2008) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.0705797105 · Cited by 753
Smallholder Specialization Strategies along the Forest Transition Curve in Southwestern Amazonia
Duchelle, A. E., Almeyda Zambrano, A. M., Wunder, S., Börner, J., & Kainer, K. A. (2014) · World Development · doi:10.1016/j.worlddev.2014.03.001 · Cited by 57
Souto, T., Deichmann, J. L., Núñez, C., & Alonso, A. (2014) · Biodiversity and Conservation · doi:10.1007/s10531-014-0659-9 · Cited by 30
Metadata
- Authors
- Kaimowitz, D., & Sheil, D.
- Venue
- Biotropica
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2007-06-15
- Volume
- 39
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 567-574
- ISSN
- 0006-3606 (ISSN-L)
- 1744-7429
- OpenAlex
- W2148842116
- Cited by
- 178
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 12.40
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Conserving What and for Whom? Why Conservation Should Help Meet Basic Human Needs in the Tropics. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1744-7429.2007.00332.x
- The paper
- Kaimowitz, D., & Sheil, D. (2007). Conserving What and for Whom? Why Conservation Should Help Meet Basic Human Needs in the Tropics. Biotropica. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-7429.2007.00332.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.