The DOI matches its Crossref record; 179 of the 179 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
30 years of free‐air carbon dioxide enrichment (FACE): What have we learned about future crop productivity and its potential for adaptation?
Abstract
Free‐air CO 2 enrichment (FACE) allows open‐air elevation of [CO 2] without altering the microclimate. Its scale uniquely supports simultaneous study from physiology and yield to soil processes and disease. In 2005 we summarized results of then 28 published observations by meta‐analysis. Subsequent studies have combined FACE with temperature, drought, ozone, and nitrogen treatments. Here, we summarize the results of now almost 250 observations, spanning 14 sites and five continents. Across 186 independent studies of 18 C 3 crops, elevation of [CO 2] by ca. 200 ppm caused a ca. 18% increase in yield under non‐stress conditions. Legumes and root crops showed a greater increase and cereals less. Nitrogen deficiency reduced the average increase to 10%, as did warming by ca. 2°C. Two conclusions of the 2005 analysis were that C 4 crops would not be more productive in elevated [CO 2], except under drought, and that yield responses of C 3 crops were diminished by nitrogen deficiency and wet conditions. Both stand the test of time. Further studies of maize and sorghum showed no yield increase, except in drought, while soybean productivity was negatively affected by early growing season wet conditions. Subsequent study showed reduced levels of nutrients, notably Zn and Fe in most crops, and lower nitrogen and protein in the seeds of non‐leguminous crops. Testing across crop germplasm revealed sufficient variation to maintain nutrient content under rising [CO 2]. A strong correlation of yield response under elevated [CO 2] to genetic yield potential in both rice and soybean was observed. Rice cultivars with the highest yield potential showed a 35% yield increase in elevated [CO 2] compared to an average of 14%. Future FACE experiments have the potential to develop cultivars and management strategies for co‐promoting sustainability and productivity under future elevated [CO 2].
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Influence of extreme weather disasters on global crop production
Lesk, C., Rowhani, P., & Ramankutty, N. (2016) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature16467 · Cited by 3,883
Anthropogenic and Natural Radiative Forcing
(2014) · Climate Change 2013 – The Physical Science Basis · doi:10.1017/cbo9781107415324.018 · Cited by 3,683
Ainsworth, E. A., & Long, S. P. (2005) · New Phytologist · doi:10.1111/j.1469-8137.2004.01224.x · Cited by 3,624
Self-citationNonlinear temperature effects indicate severe damages to U.S. crop yields under climate change
Schlenker, W., & Roberts, M. J. (2009) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.0906865106 · Cited by 3,420
Yield trends are insufficient to double global crop production by 2050
Ray, D. K., Mueller, N. D., West, P. C., & Foley, J. A. (2013) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0066428 · Cited by 3,415
Temperature increase reduces global yields of major crops in four independent estimates
Zhao, C., Liu, B., Piao, S., Wang, X., Lobell, D. B., Huang, Y., Huang, M., Yao, Y., Bassu, S., Ciais, P., et al. (2017) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1701762114 · Cited by 3,311
A meta-analysis of crop yield under climate change and adaptation
Challinor, A. J., Watson, J., Lobell, D. B., Howden, S. M., Smith, D. R., & Chhetri, N. (2014) · Nature Climate Change · doi:10.1038/nclimate2153 · Cited by 2,333 · cited 1×
“…approach has since been applied to quantify responses of individual crops to rising atmospheric [CO2] (e.g., Ainsworth, 2008; Broberg et al., 2017; Challinor et al., 2014; Kimball, 2016; Taub et al., 2008; van der Kooi et al., 2016; Wang et al., 2012, 2015) and to investigate how the CO2…”
BackgroundAINSWORTH, E. A., & ROGERS, A. (2007) · Plant, Cell & Environment · doi:10.1111/j.1365-3040.2007.01641.x · Cited by 2,303
Self-citationThe effect of drought and heat stress on reproductive processes in cereals
BARNABÁS, B., JÄGER, K., & FEHÉR, A. (2008) · Plant, Cell & Environment · doi:10.1111/j.1365-3040.2007.01727.x · Cited by 2,066
Bita, C. E., & Gerats, T. (2013) · Frontiers in Plant Science · doi:10.3389/fpls.2013.00273 · Cited by 1,869
Cited by
Developing climate‐resilient crops: improving plant tolerance to stress combination
Rivero, R. M., Mittler, R., Blumwald, E., & Zandalinas, S. I. (2022) · The Plant Journal · doi:10.1111/tpj.15483 · Cited by 622
Subedi, B., Poudel, A., & Aryal, S. (2023) · Journal of Agriculture and Food Research · doi:10.1016/j.jafr.2023.100733 · Cited by 267
Evidence and attribution of the enhanced land carbon sink
Ruehr, S., Keenan, T. F., Williams, C., Zhou, Y., Lu, X., Bastos, A., Canadell, J. G., Prentice, I. C., Sitch, S., & Terrer, C. (2023) · Nature Reviews Earth & Environment · doi:10.1038/s43017-023-00456-3 · Cited by 253
Metadata
- Authors
- Ainsworth, E. A., & Long, S. P.
- Venue
- Global Change Biology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2020-11-02
- Volume
- 27
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 27-49
- ISSN
- 1354-1013 (ISSN-L)
- 1365-2486
- OpenAlex
- W3095582665
- Cited by
- 592
- References
- 179
- FWCI
- 33.16
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: 30 years of free‐air carbon dioxide enrichment (FACE): What have we learned about future crop productivity and its potential for adaptation? https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/gcb.15375
- The paper
- Ainsworth, E. A., & Long, S. P. (2021). 30 years of free‐air carbon dioxide enrichment (FACE): What have we learned about future crop productivity and its potential for adaptation? Global Change Biology. https://doi.org/10.1111/gcb.15375
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.