The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Too big to fail? The puzzling darkness of massive Milky Way subhaloes
Open accessAbstract
We show that dissipationless Λ cold dark matter simulations predict that the majority of the most massive subhaloes of the Milky Way are too dense to host any of its bright satellites (LV > 105 L⊙). These dark subhaloes have peak circular velocities at infall of Vinfall= 30–70 km s-1 and infall masses of (0.2–4) × 1010 M⊙. Unless the Milky Way is a statistical anomaly, this implies that galaxy formation becomes effectively stochastic at these masses. This is in marked contrast to the well-established monotonic relation between galaxy luminosity and halo circular velocity (or halo mass) for more massive haloes. We show that at least two (and typically four) of these massive dark subhaloes are expected to produce a larger dark matter annihilation flux than Draco. It may be possible to circumvent these conclusions if baryonic feedback in dwarf satellites or different dark matter physics can reduce the central densities of massive subhaloes by order unity on a scale of 0.3–1 kpc.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
RE-ASSEMBLING THE SAGITTARIUS DWARF GALAXY
Niederste-Ostholt, M., Belokurov, V., Evans, N. W., & Peñarrubia, J. (2010) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.1088/0004-637x/712/1/516 · Cited by 139
Cited by
Harko, T., Lobo, F. S. N., Nojiri, S., & Odintsov, S. D. (2011) · Physical Review D · doi:10.1103/physrevd.84.024020 · Cited by 2,772
Dark matter self-interactions and small scale structure
Tulin, S., & Yu, H.-B. (2018) · Physics Reports · doi:10.1016/j.physrep.2017.11.004 · Cited by 1,111
Theoretical Challenges in Galaxy Formation
Naab, T., & Ostriker, J. P. (2017) · Annual Review of Astronomy and Astrophysics · doi:10.1146/annurev-astro-081913-040019 · Cited by 722
Kaplinghat, M., Tulin, S., & Yu, H.-B. (2016) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.116.041302 · Cited by 560
Self-citationBeyond collisionless dark matter: Particle physics dynamics for dark matter halo structure
Tulin, S., Yu, H.-B., & Zurek, K. M. (2013) · Physical Review D · doi:10.1103/physrevd.87.115007 · Cited by 516
Metadata
- Authors
- Boylan-Kolchin, M., Bullock, J. S., & Kaplinghat, M.
- Venue
- Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society: Letters
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2011-07-01
- Volume
- 415
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- L40-L44
- ISSN
- 1745-3925 (ISSN-L)
- 1745-3933
- OpenAlex
- W2138029281
- Cited by
- 1,394
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 36.99
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Too big to fail? The puzzling darkness of massive Milky Way subhaloes. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1745-3933.2011.01074.x
- The paper
- Boylan-Kolchin, M., Bullock, J. S., & Kaplinghat, M. (2011). Too big to fail? The puzzling darkness of massive Milky Way subhaloes. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society: Letters. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-3933.2011.01074.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.