Cited by 139Galaxies: Formation, Evolution, PhenomenaStellar, planetary, and galactic studiesAstrophysical Phenomena and Observations

RE-ASSEMBLING THE SAGITTARIUS DWARF GALAXY

Open access
Niederste-Ostholt, M., Belokurov, V., Evans, N. W., Peñarrubia, J.·2010·The Astrophysical Journal

Abstract

What was the mass of the progenitor of the Sagittarius (Sgr) dwarf galaxy? Here, we reassemble the stellar debris using Sloan Digital Sky Survey and Two Micron All-Sky Survey data to find the total luminosity and likely mass. We find that the luminosity is in the range (9.6–13.2) × 10 7 L ☉ or M V ∼ −15.1 to −15.5, with 70% of the light residing in the debris streams. The progenitor is somewhat fainter than the present-day Small Magellanic Cloud, and comparable in brightness to the M31 dwarf spheroidals NGC 147 and NGC 185. Using cosmologically motivated models, we estimate that the mass of Sgr's dark matter halo prior to tidal disruption was ∼10 10 M ☉ .

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1088/0004-637x/712/1/516

Cites

45 of 45 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 46 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Niederste-Ostholt, M., Belokurov, V., Evans, N. W., & Peñarrubia, J.
Affiliations
University of Cambridge (GB)
Venue
The Astrophysical Journal
Published
2010-03-03
Volume
712
Issue
1
Pages
516-526
ISSN
  • 0004-637X (ISSN-L)
  • 1538-4357
OpenAlex
W2045041357
Cited by
139
References
46
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 14 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 13 · 2017: 10 · 2016: 10 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 14 · 2013: 7 · 2012: 8
FWCI
6.42
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • The Astrophysical Journal (publishedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Funders
  • National Science Foundation
  • U.S. Department of Energy
  • National Aeronautics and Space Administration
  • Alfred P. Sloan Foundation
  • California Institute of Technology
  • Max-Planck-Gesellschaft
  • Science and Technology Facilities Council (ST/H00243X/1, PP/E00105X/1, ST/H001913/1)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Galaxies: Formation, Evolution, Phenomena
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Stellar, planetary, and galactic studies
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Astrophysical Phenomena and Observations
Keywords
Sagittarius dwarf galaxy, progenitor mass, tidal disruption, halo mass, dwarf spheroidal galaxies, Small Magellanic Cloud, NGC 147, NGC 185, Galactic halo

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review