The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Prograde and retrograde black holes: whose jet is more powerful?
Open accessAbstract
The outflow efficiency (η) from black hole (BH) accretion disc systems is known to depend upon both the BH spin (a) and the amount of large-scale magnetic flux threading the BH and disc. Semi-analytical flux-trapping models suggest retrograde BHs should trap much more large-scale magnetic flux near the BH leading to much higher η than for prograde BHs. We self-consistently determine the amount of large-scale magnetic flux trapped by rapidly spinning (a=−0.9 and 0.9) BHs using global 3D time-dependent non-radiative general relativistic magnetohydrodynamic simulations of thick (h/r≈ 0.3–0.6) discs. We find that BH-trapped flux builds up until it is strong enough to disrupt the inner accretion disc. Contrary to prior flux-trapping models, which do not include the back-reaction of magnetic flux on the disc, our simulations show prograde BHs trap more magnetic flux, leading to about three times higher η than retrograde BHs for |a|= 0.9. Both spin orientations can produce highly efficient jets, η∼ 100 per cent, with increasing η for increasing disc thickness. The similarity of η for prograde and retrograde BHs makes it challenging to infer the sign of a based on jet energetics alone.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Electromagnetic extraction of energy from Kerr black holes
Blandford, R. D., & Znajek, R. L. (1977) · Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society · doi:10.1093/mnras/179.3.433 · Cited by 5,116
Cited by
Hot Accretion Flows Around Black Holes
Yuan, F., & Narayan, R. (2014) · Annual Review of Astronomy and Astrophysics · doi:10.1146/annurev-astro-082812-141003 · Cited by 1,529
The physics of gamma-ray bursts & relativistic jets
Kumar, P., & Zhang, B. (2015) · Physics Reports · doi:10.1016/j.physrep.2014.09.008 · Cited by 952
Relativistic Jets from Active Galactic Nuclei
Blandford, R., Meier, D., & Readhead, A. (2019) · Annual Review of Astronomy and Astrophysics · doi:10.1146/annurev-astro-081817-051948 · Cited by 847
Jet-Launching Structure Resolved Near the Supermassive Black Hole in M87
Doeleman, S. S., Fish, V. L., Schenck, D. E., Beaudoin, C., Blundell, R., Bower, G. C., Broderick, A. E., Chamberlin, R., Freund, R., Friberg, P., et al. (2012) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1224768 · Cited by 414
Numerical simulations of super-critical black hole accretion flows in general relativity
Sądowski, A., Narayan, R., McKinney, J. C., & Tchekhovskoy, A. (2014) · Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society · doi:10.1093/mnras/stt2479 · Cited by 335
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Tchekhovskoy, A., & McKinney, J. C.
- Venue
- Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society: Letters
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2012-06-01
- Volume
- 423
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- L55-L59
- ISSN
- 1745-3925 (ISSN-L)
- 1745-3933
- OpenAlex
- W1937766568
- Cited by
- 204
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 10.81
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Prograde and retrograde black holes: whose jet is more powerful? https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1745-3933.2012.01256.x
- The paper
- Tchekhovskoy, A., & McKinney, J. C. (2012). Prograde and retrograde black holes: whose jet is more powerful? Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society: Letters. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-3933.2012.01256.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.