Interpretive problems when correcting for attenuation
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Applying this sort of correction can magnify spurious effects in the data.
“it is well-known that applying this sort of correction can magnify spurious effects in the data (e.g.Winne & Belfry, 1982; to illustrate, a raw correlation of .46 would have yielded a corrected correlation greater than 1).”
From No negative Flynn effect in France: Why variations of intelligence should not be assessed using tests based on cultural knowledge (2021) · cites this paper as Winne & Belfry, 1982
Cited by
Sorted by citations
The reliability paradox: Why robust cognitive tasks do not produce reliable individual differences
Hedge, C., Powell, G., & Sumner, P. (2018) · Behavior Research Methods · doi:10.3758/s13428-017-0935-1 · Cited by 1,457 · see citing works
Charles, E. P. (2005) · Psychological Methods · doi:10.1037/1082-989x.10.2.206 · Cited by 154 · see citing works
Raković, M., Winne, P. H., Marzouk, Z., & Chang, D. (2021) · Journal of Computer Assisted Learning · doi:10.1111/jcal.12531 · Cited by 26 · see citing works
Gonthier, C., Grégoire, J., & Besançon, M. (2021) · Intelligence · doi:10.1016/j.intell.2020.101512 · Cited by 20 · see citing works
- Authors
- WlNNE, P. H., & BELFRY, M. J.
- Affiliations
- Simon Fraser University (CA)
- Corresponding author
- WlNNE, PHILIP H.
- Venue
- Journal of Educational Measurement
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 1982-06
- Volume
- 19
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 125-134
- ISSN
- 0022-0655 (ISSN-L)
- 1745-3984
- OpenAlex
- W2047581579
- Cited by
- 48
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 4 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 1
- FWCI
- 3.40
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of Educational Measurement (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Psychometric Methodologies and Testing
- Social Sciences › Education › Educational Assessment and Pedagogy
- Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty › Multidisciplinary Science and Engineering Research
- Keywords
- attenuation correction, test-retest reliability, measurement error
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
