The DOI matches its Crossref record; 15 of the 15 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Item Clusters and Computerized Adaptive Testing: A Case for Testlets
Abstract
It is observed that many sorts of difficulties may preclude the uneventful construction of tests by a computerized algorithm, such as those currently in favor in Computerized Adaptive Testing (CAT). In this essay we discuss a number of these problems, as well as some possible avenues of solution. We conclude with the development of the “testlet,” a bundle of items that can be arranged either hierarchically or linearly, thus maintaining the efficiency of an adaptive test while keeping the quality control of test construction that is possible currently only with careful expert scrutiny. Performance on the separate testlets is aggregated to yield ability estimates.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Applications of Item Response Theory To Practical Testing Problems
Lord, F. M. (2012) · Routledge eBooks · doi:10.4324/9780203056615 · Cited by 5,007
ESTIMATION OF LATENT ABILITY USING A RESPONSE PATTERN OF GRADED SCORES1
Samejima, F. (1968) · ETS Research Bulletin Series · doi:10.1002/j.2333-8504.1968.tb00153.x · Cited by 2,587
Estimation of Latent Ability Using a Response Pattern of Graded Scores
Samejima, F. (1969) · Psychometrika · doi:10.1007/bf03372160 · Cited by 2,194
Bock, R. D. (1972) · Psychometrika · doi:10.1007/bf02291411 · Cited by 1,228
Contemporary Developments in Mathematical Psychology
Humphreys, M. S., Krantz, D. H., Atkinson, R., Luce, R. D., & Suppes, P. (1976) · The American Journal of Psychology · doi:10.2307/1421426 · Cited by 984
Full-Information Item Factor Analysis
Bock, R. D., Gibbons, R., & Muraki, E. (1988) · Applied Psychological Measurement · doi:10.1177/014662168801200305 · Cited by 528
Lord, F. M. (1952) · Cited by 494
PRACTICAL APPLICATIONS OF ITEM CHARACTERISTIC CURVE THEORY*
LORD, F. M. (1977) · Journal of Educational Measurement · doi:10.1111/j.1745-3984.1977.tb00032.x · Cited by 184
A Broad-Range Tailored Test of Verbal Ability
Lord, F. M. (1977) · Applied Psychological Measurement · doi:10.1177/014662167700100115 · Cited by 121
Andrich, D. (1985) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/b978-0-12-238180-5.50013-6 · Cited by 85
Cited by
Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. B., Lee, J.-Y., & Podsakoff, N. P. (2003) · Journal of Applied Psychology · doi:10.1037/0021-9010.88.5.879 · Cited by 82,194
A Review of Multiple-Choice Item-Writing Guidelines for Classroom Assessment
Haladyna, T. M., Downing, S. M., & Rodriguez, M. C. (2002) · Applied Measurement in Education · doi:10.1207/s15324818ame1503_5 · Cited by 973
Scaling Performance Assessments: Strategies for Managing Local Item Dependence
Yen, W. M. (1993) · Journal of Educational Measurement · doi:10.1111/j.1745-3984.1993.tb00423.x · Cited by 744
Internal construct validity of the Shirom-Melamed Burnout questionnaire (SMBQ)
Lundgren-Nilsson, Å., Jonsdottir, I. H., Pallant, J., & Ahlborg, G. (2012) · BMC Public Health · doi:10.1186/1471-2458-12-1 · Cited by 626
Validation of the KOOS, JR: A Short-form Knee Arthroplasty Outcomes Survey
Lyman, S., Lee, Y.-Y., Franklin, P. D., Li, W., Cross, M. B., & Padgett, D. E. (2016) · Clinical Orthopaedics & Related Research · doi:10.1007/s11999-016-4719-1 · Cited by 473
Metadata
- Authors
- Wainer, H., & Kiely, G. L.
- Venue
- Journal of Educational Measurement
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 1987-09
- Volume
- 24
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 185-201
- ISSN
- 0022-0655 (ISSN-L)
- 1745-3984
- OpenAlex
- W2090212281
- Cited by
- 630
- References
- 15
- FWCI
- 11.27
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Item Clusters and Computerized Adaptive Testing: A Case for Testlets. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1745-3984.1987.tb00274.x
- The paper
- Wainer, H., & Kiely, G. L. (1987). Item Clusters and Computerized Adaptive Testing: A Case for Testlets. Journal of Educational Measurement. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-3984.1987.tb00274.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.