Cited by 25Psychometric Methodologies and TestingCritical Race Theory in EducationCareer Development and Diversity

Race‐Based Differential Prediction in Air Force Technical Training Programs

Houston, Walter M., Noviek, Melvin R.·1987·Journal of Educational Measurement

Abstract

Bayesian Johnson‐Neyman methodology was used to investigate differential prediction by race in United States Air Force technical training programs. Meaningful Johnson‐Neyman regions of differences were found in eight of nine comparisons. In all nine training courses the regressions for blacks were flatter than for whites and the race‐differentiated regression lines intersected within the range of predictor test scores. In six cases the cut‐score for course qualification was within the Johnson‐Neyman region, and in every case the bias was negative for blacks. It is noted that if the cut score had been set substantially higher the bias would have been positive for blacks in all cases. This analysis may explain why earlier studies that averaged bias across the predictor distribution yielded mixed results. It is hypothesized that the consistent results obtained here are a consequence of the lower predictability found in the black subpopulation.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1745-3984.1987.tb00282.x

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Houston, W. M., & Noviek, M. R.
Affiliations
University of Iowa (US)
Corresponding author
Houston, Walter M.
Venue
Journal of Educational Measurement
Publisher
Wiley
Published
1987-12
Volume
24
Issue
4
Pages
309-320
ISSN
  • 0022-0655 (ISSN-L)
  • 1745-3984
OpenAlex
W2049111406
Cited by
25
References
0
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 1
FWCI
0.60
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Journal of Educational Measurement (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Psychometric Methodologies and Testing
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Critical Race Theory in Education
  • Social Sciences › Safety Research › Career Development and Diversity
Keywords
predictive bias, cut-off values, technical training programs, United States Air Force, black-white disparities

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review