The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Item Analysis by the Hierarchical Generalized Linear Model
Abstract
The hierarchical generalized linear model (HGLM) is presented as an explicit, two‐level formulation of a multilevel item response model. In this paper, it is shown that the HGLM is equivalent to the Rasch model and that, characteristic of the HGLM, person ability can be expressed in the form of random effects rather than parameters. The two‐level item analysis model is presented as a latent regression model with person‐characteristic variables. Furthermore, it is shown that the two‐level HGLM model can be extended to a three‐level latent regression model that permits investigation of the variation of students' performance across groups, such as is found in classrooms and schools, and of the interactive effect of person‐and group‐characteristic variables.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
McCullagh, P., & Nelder, J. A. (1989) · doi:10.1007/978-1-4899-3242-6 · Cited by 16,836
Using SAS PROC MIXED to Fit Multilevel Models, Hierarchical Models, and Individual Growth Models
Singer, J. D. (1998) · Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics · doi:10.2307/1165280 · Cited by 1,092
Cited by
Handbook of multimethod measurement in psychology.
(2006) · American Psychological Association eBooks · doi:10.1037/11383-000 · Cited by 481
Measuring progressions: Assessment structures underlying a learning progression
Wilson, M. (2009) · Journal of Research in Science Teaching · doi:10.1002/tea.20318 · Cited by 329
Metadata
- Authors
- Kamata, A.
- Venue
- Journal of Educational Measurement
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2001-03
- Volume
- 38
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 79-93
- ISSN
- 0022-0655 (ISSN-L)
- 1745-3984
- OpenAlex
- W2031792658
- Cited by
- 255
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 6.64
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Item Analysis by the Hierarchical Generalized Linear Model. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1745-3984.2001.tb01117.x
- The paper
- Kamata, A. (2001). Item Analysis by the Hierarchical Generalized Linear Model. Journal of Educational Measurement. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-3984.2001.tb01117.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.