The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Investigating the Cognitive Complexity of Science Assessments
Abstract
How can knowledge of the development of expertise in a subject area inform the development of assessments in that area? How can one examine the relationship between what is anticipated from a performance assessment and what is actually seen?
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Novak, J. D., Gowin, D. B., & Kahle, J. B. (1984) · doi:10.1017/cbo9781139173469 · Cited by 5,199
Chase, W. G., & Simon, H. A. (1973) · Cognitive Psychology · doi:10.1016/0010-0285(73)90004-2 · Cited by 4,479
Protocol Analysis: Verbal Reports as Data
Ericsson, K. A., & Simon, H. A. (1993) · doi:10.7551/mitpress/5657.001.0001 · Cited by 3,537
The interplay of evidence and consequences in the validation of performance assessments
Messick, S. (1994) · Educational Researcher · doi:10.3102/0013189x023002013 · Cited by 1,315
Cited by
Chunking mechanisms in human learning
GOBET, F., LANE, P., CROKER, S., CHENG, P., JONES, G., OLIVER, I., & PINE, J. (2001) · Trends in Cognitive Sciences · doi:10.1016/s1364-6613(00)01662-4 · Cited by 1,157
Leighton, J. P., Gierl, M. J., & Hunka, S. M. (2004) · Journal of Educational Measurement · doi:10.1111/j.1745-3984.2004.tb01163.x · Cited by 391
On the cultural validity of science assessments
Solano‐Flores, G., & Nelson‐Barber, S. (2001) · Journal of Research in Science Teaching · doi:10.1002/tea.1018 · Cited by 314
Comparison of two concept-mapping techniques: Implications for scoring, interpretation, and use
Yin, Y., Vanides, J., Ruiz-Primo, M. A., Ayala, C. C., & Shavelson, R. J. (2005) · Journal of Research in Science Teaching · doi:10.1002/tea.20049 · Cited by 305
(2004) · Cited by 117
Metadata
- Authors
- Baxter, G. P., & Glaser, R.
- Venue
- Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 1998-09
- Volume
- 17
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 37-45
- ISSN
- 0731-1745 (ISSN-L)
- 1745-3992
- OpenAlex
- W2124109122
- Cited by
- 172
- References
- 4
- FWCI
- 36.36
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Investigating the Cognitive Complexity of Science Assessments. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1745-3992.1998.tb00627.x
- The paper
- Baxter, G. P., & Glaser, R. (1998). Investigating the Cognitive Complexity of Science Assessments. Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-3992.1998.tb00627.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
