Cited by 67Essential Oils and Antimicrobial ActivityEdible Oils Quality and AnalysisPhytochemicals and Antioxidant Activities

Antibacterial activity and chemicaL constitutions of Olea europaea L. leaf extracts

KORUKLUOGLU, MIHRIBAN, SAHAN, YASEMIN, YIGIT, AYCAN, OZER, ELIF TUMAY, GÜCER, SEREF·2010·Journal of Food Processing and Preservation

Abstract

ABSTRACT The in vitro antimicrobial activity of aqueous, acetone, diethyl ether and ethyl alcohol extracts of olive leaves (Olea europaea L.) was studied. The aqueous extract of olive leaves had no antibacterial effect against the test microorganisms, whereas acetone extract showed inhibitory effect on Salmonella enteritidis, Bacillus cereus, Klebsiella pneumoniae, Escherichia coli, Enterococcus faecalis, Streptococcus thermophilus and Lactobacillus bulgaricus. Furthermore, the antimicrobial activities of some phenolic compounds against microorganisms were tested. The most effective compound was found to be oleuropein while syringic acid was found ineffective. The characterization of phenolic compounds in different extracts determined by high performance liquid chromatography-air pressure chemical ionization-mass spectrometry detector (HPLC-APCI-MSD GC-MS) gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (GC-MS). The acetone and the ethyl alcohol extracts had the most and the least oleuropein content, respectively. PRACTICAL APPLICATIONS In recent years the extracts of many plant species have become popular, and attempts to characterize their bioactive principles have gained speed for many pharmaceutical and food-processing applications. Especially, antimicrobial properties of plants have revived as a consequence of current problems associated with the use of chemical preservatives. Because of consumers' negative perspectives of synthetic preservatives, attention is shifting toward natural alternatives. The findings suggest that olive leaf extracts and their phenolic compounds have good potential as antibacterial substances in food preservation as they may be more acceptable to consumers and the regulatory agencies in comparison with synthetic chemical compounds.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1745-4549.2008.00318.x

Cites

33 of 33 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
KORUKLUOGLU, M., SAHAN, Y., YIGIT, A., OZER, E. T., & GÜCER, S.
Venue
Journal of Food Processing and Preservation
Published
2010-01-05
Volume
34
Issue
3
Pages
383-396
ISSN
  • 0145-8892 (ISSN-L)
  • 1745-4549
OpenAlex
W1792057742
Cited by
67
References
33
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 1
FWCI
2.45
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Food Processing and Preservation (publishedVersion)
  • Bursa Uludag University - AVESIS (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Food Science › Essential Oils and Antimicrobial Activity
  • Physical Sciences › Chemistry › Organic Chemistry › Edible Oils Quality and Analysis
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Biochemistry › Phytochemicals and Antioxidant Activities
Keywords
Olea europaea, olive leaf extract, antibacterial activity, phenolic compounds, oleuropein, syringic acid, food preservatives, natural antimicrobials, Salmonella Enteritidis, Lactobacillus bulgaricus, Enterococcus faecalis, plant extracts

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review