The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
STRATEGIC ALIGNMENT AND PURCHASING EFFICACY: AN EXPLORATORY ANALYSIS OF THEIR IMPACT ON FINANCIAL PERFORMANCE
Abstract
Purchasing and supply management (PSM) has become a discipline of major strategic importance for effectively competing in today's global marketplace. Literature recognizes that the full value‐creation potential of the purchasing function can only be realized if its decisions and activities are aligned with the organization's overall strategic orientation. Despite general agreement on this matter, research and practice lacks knowledge on how exactly such an alignment can be achieved and what performance implications it has. Therefore, this article empirically investigates the alignment–performance link in PSM in a comprehensive manner. Drawing on the theory of production competence, we suggest that the relative fit between business strategy and purchasing strategy, labeled as strategic alignment, and between purchasing strategy and purchasing practices, referred to as purchasing efficacy, is key to achieving superior financial performance. Results from profile deviation analysis on data collected globally from 141 strategic business units (SBUs) with revenues greater than US$S3 billion support our hypotheses. Findings provide clear guidance to managers on how to design their purchasing strategies and practices to achieve maximum alignment and thus to effectively contribute to the SBU's financial success.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
A Paradigm for Developing Better Measures of Marketing Constructs
Churchill, G. A. (1979) · Journal of Marketing Research · doi:10.1177/002224377901600110 · Cited by 16,549
Practical issues in structural modeling
BENTLER, P. M., & CHOU, C.-P. (1987) · Sociological Methods & Research · doi:10.1177/0049124187016001004 · Cited by 5,804
Measuring and Explaining Management Practices Across Firms and Countries
Bloom, N., & Van Reenen, J. (2007) · The Quarterly Journal of Economics · doi:10.1162/qjec.2007.122.4.1351 · Cited by 2,373
Representing and Testing Organizational Theories: A Holistic Construal
Bagozzi, R. P., & Phillips, L. W. (1982) · Administrative Science Quarterly · doi:10.2307/2392322 · Cited by 2,064
Spanos, Y. E., & Lioukas, S. (2001) · Strategic Management Journal · doi:10.1002/smj.174 · Cited by 1,113
Cited by
A transaction costs approach to purchasing portfolio management
Luzzini, D., Caniato, F., Ronchi, S., & Spina, G. (2012) · International Journal of Operations & Production Management · doi:10.1108/01443571211265684 · Cited by 88
Structuring the phenomenon of procurement digitalisation: Contexts, interventions and mechanisms
Lorentz, H., Aminoff, A., Kaipia, R., & Srai, J. S. (2021) · International Journal of Operations & Production Management · doi:10.1108/ijopm-03-2020-0150 · Cited by 51
Metadata
- Authors
- BAIER, C., HARTMANN, E., & MOSER, R.
- Venue
- Journal of Supply Chain Management
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2008-09
- Volume
- 44
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 36-52
- ISSN
- 1055-6001 (ISSN-L)
- 1523-2409
- 1745-493X
- OpenAlex
- W2057311149
- Cited by
- 159
- References
- 5
- FWCI
- 15.46
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: STRATEGIC ALIGNMENT AND PURCHASING EFFICACY: AN EXPLORATORY ANALYSIS OF THEIR IMPACT ON FINANCIAL PERFORMANCE. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1745-493x.2008.00071.x
- The paper
- BAIER, C., HARTMANN, E., & MOSER, R. (2008). STRATEGIC ALIGNMENT AND PURCHASING EFFICACY: AN EXPLORATORY ANALYSIS OF THEIR IMPACT ON FINANCIAL PERFORMANCE. Journal of Supply Chain Management. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-493x.2008.00071.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.