The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
BUILDING A MORE COMPLETE THEORY OF SUSTAINABLE SUPPLY CHAIN MANAGEMENT USING CASE STUDIES OF 10 EXEMPLARS
Abstract
Case studies of 10 exemplar firms are used to build a coherent and testable model of the elements necessary to create a sustainable supply chain. The cases build on previous research by examining the chain as an entirety, by explicitly examining both the social and environmental outcomes of the chain's activities, and by explicitly asking what these exemplar organizations are doing that is unique in regards to managing their supply chains in a sustainable manner. The analysis suggests that the practices that lead to a more sustainable supply chain are equal parts best practices in traditional supply chain management and new behaviors, some of which run counter to existing accepted “best” practice.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Building Theories from Case Study Research
Eisenhardt, K. M. (1989) · The Academy of Management Review · doi:10.2307/258557 · Cited by 17,455
Mixing Qualitative and Quantitative Methods: Triangulation in Action.
Jick, T. D. (1979) · Administrative Science Quarterly · doi:10.2307/2392366 · Cited by 7,103
Green purchasing practices of US firms
Min, H., & Galle, W. P. (2001) · International Journal of Operations & Production Management · doi:10.1108/eum0000000005923 · Cited by 745
Purchasing's Role in Environmental Management: Cross‐Functional Development of Grounded Theory
Carter, C. R., & Dresner, M. (2001) · Journal of Supply Chain Management · doi:10.1111/j.1745-493x.2001.tb00102.x · Cited by 384
Cited by
Balancing priorities: decision-making in sustainable supply chain management
Wu, Z., & Pagell, M. (2011) · Journal of Operations Management · doi:10.1016/j.jom.2010.10.001 · Cited by 956
Self-citationCan big data and predictive analytics improve social and environmental sustainability?
Dubey, R., Gunasekaran, A., Childe, S. J., Papadopoulos, T., Luo, Z., Wamba, S. F., & Roubaud, D. (2019) · Technological Forecasting and Social Change · doi:10.1016/j.techfore.2017.06.020 · Cited by 860
Multi-tier sustainable global supplier selection using a fuzzy AHP-VIKOR based approach
Awasthi, A., Govindan, K., & Gold, S. (2018) · International Journal of Production Economics · doi:10.1016/j.ijpe.2017.10.013 · Cited by 544
Sustainable consumption and production in the food supply chain: A conceptual framework
Govindan, K. (2018) · International Journal of Production Economics · doi:10.1016/j.ijpe.2017.03.003 · Cited by 539
Wilhelm, M. M., Blome, C., Bhakoo, V., & Paulraj, A. (2016) · Journal of Operations Management · doi:10.1016/j.jom.2015.11.001 · Cited by 539
Metadata
- Authors
- PAGELL, M., & WU, Z.
- Venue
- Journal of Supply Chain Management
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2009-03-25
- Volume
- 45
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 37-56
- ISSN
- 1055-6001 (ISSN-L)
- 1523-2409
- 1745-493X
- OpenAlex
- W2071863310
- Cited by
- 1,815
- References
- 4
- FWCI
- 98.26
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: BUILDING A MORE COMPLETE THEORY OF SUSTAINABLE SUPPLY CHAIN MANAGEMENT USING CASE STUDIES OF 10 EXEMPLARS. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1745-493x.2009.03162.x
- The paper
- PAGELL, M., & WU, Z. (2009). BUILDING A MORE COMPLETE THEORY OF SUSTAINABLE SUPPLY CHAIN MANAGEMENT USING CASE STUDIES OF 10 EXEMPLARS. Journal of Supply Chain Management. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-493x.2009.03162.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
