Cited by 411Sustainable Supply Chain ManagementQuality and Supply ManagementSupply Chain and Inventory Management

THINKING DIFFERENTLY ABOUT PURCHASING PORTFOLIOS: AN ASSESSMENT OF SUSTAINABLE SOURCING

PAGELL, MARK, WU, ZHAOHUI, WASSERMAN, MICHAEL E.·2010·Journal of Supply Chain Management

Abstract

Kraljic is widely viewed as a driving force behind the concepts of supply management and purchasing portfolios. Kraljic proposed that supply management professionals needed to engage in a new approach, embracing globalization, technology and risk. This article marked a critical juncture for supply chain management. Almost three decades later, it is evident that the purchasing portfolio concept has been widely adopted as an effective practitioner tool and a well-accepted tenet in the supply chain management literature. However, a recently completed study yielded interesting evidence of a potential shift in supply chain management, specifically, in sustainable sourcing. We recently observed that a number of leaders in sustainable supply chain management (SSCM) were not organizing purchasing portfolios in the manner suggested by Kraljic. We found organizations buying what would traditionally be leveraged commodities in a manner more appropriate for strategic suppliers. This unexpected observation suggests that the supply chain field may face another critical juncture, this time related to SSCM. This manuscript describes the observed phenomena and then, using an inductive approach, enhances the existing theory to explain what was observed. The end result is a modified sustainable purchasing portfolio model that should provide a strategic tool to help both academics and practitioners adapt to the new realities of SSCM.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1745-493x.2009.03186.x

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Scholars have continued to highlight the lack of accompanying theoretical development.

    “So while the overall body of literature in this area has grown rapidly, scholars have continued to highlight the lack of accompanying theoretical development (Pagell, Wu & Wasserman 2010).”

    From Conceptualising the adoption of sustainable procurement: an institutional theory perspective (2014) · cites this paper as Pagell, Wu & Wasserman 2010

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
PAGELL, M., WU, Z., & WASSERMAN, M. E.
Affiliations
  • York University (CA)
  • Oregon State University (US)
  • Clarkson University (US)
Venue
Journal of Supply Chain Management
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2010-01
Volume
46
Issue
1
Pages
57-73
ISSN
  • 1055-6001 (ISSN-L)
  • 1523-2409
  • 1745-493X
OpenAlex
W1760534880
Cited by
411
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 14 · 2025: 19 · 2024: 24 · 2023: 31 · 2022: 16 · 2021: 34 · 2020: 21 · 2019: 19 · 2018: 34 · 2017: 27 · 2016: 27 · 2015: 45 · 2014: 32 · 2013: 28 · 2012: 27
FWCI
38.32
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Journal of Supply Chain Management (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Strategy and Management › Sustainable Supply Chain Management
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Management Information Systems › Quality and Supply Management
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Management Information Systems › Supply Chain and Inventory Management
Keywords
sustainable sourcing, sustainable supply chain management, supply management, strategic suppliers, supply chain management theory

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review