THINKING DIFFERENTLY ABOUT PURCHASING PORTFOLIOS: AN ASSESSMENT OF SUSTAINABLE SOURCING
Abstract
Kraljic is widely viewed as a driving force behind the concepts of supply management and purchasing portfolios. Kraljic proposed that supply management professionals needed to engage in a new approach, embracing globalization, technology and risk. This article marked a critical juncture for supply chain management. Almost three decades later, it is evident that the purchasing portfolio concept has been widely adopted as an effective practitioner tool and a well-accepted tenet in the supply chain management literature. However, a recently completed study yielded interesting evidence of a potential shift in supply chain management, specifically, in sustainable sourcing. We recently observed that a number of leaders in sustainable supply chain management (SSCM) were not organizing purchasing portfolios in the manner suggested by Kraljic. We found organizations buying what would traditionally be leveraged commodities in a manner more appropriate for strategic suppliers. This unexpected observation suggests that the supply chain field may face another critical juncture, this time related to SSCM. This manuscript describes the observed phenomena and then, using an inductive approach, enhances the existing theory to explain what was observed. The end result is a modified sustainable purchasing portfolio model that should provide a strategic tool to help both academics and practitioners adapt to the new realities of SSCM.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Scholars have continued to highlight the lack of accompanying theoretical development.
“So while the overall body of literature in this area has grown rapidly, scholars have continued to highlight the lack of accompanying theoretical development (Pagell, Wu & Wasserman 2010).”
From Conceptualising the adoption of sustainable procurement: an institutional theory perspective (2014) · cites this paper as Pagell, Wu & Wasserman 2010
Cites
Firm Resources and Sustained Competitive Advantage
Barney, J. (1991) · Journal of Management · doi:10.1177/014920639101700108 · Cited by 48,334 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Toward a Theory of Multi‐Tier Supply Chain Management
Mena, C., Humphries, A., & Choi, T. Y. (2013) · Journal of Supply Chain Management · doi:10.1111/jscm.12003 · Cited by 483 · see citing works
Mani, V., Gunasekaran, A., & Delgado, C. (2018) · International Journal of Production Economics · doi:10.1016/j.ijpe.2017.10.025 · Cited by 408 · see citing works
The role of supply chains in the global business of forced labour
LeBaron, G. (2021) · Journal of Supply Chain Management · doi:10.1111/jscm.12258 · Cited by 186 · see citing works
Conceptualising the adoption of sustainable procurement: an institutional theory perspective
Grob, S., & Benn, S. (2014) · Australasian Journal of Environmental Management · doi:10.1080/14486563.2013.878259 · Cited by 75 · see citing works
Papaioannou, G., Mohammed, A.-M., Despoudi, S., Saridakis, G., & Papadopoulos, T. (2020) · International Journal of Information Management · doi:10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2020.102077 · Cited by 38 · see citing works
- Authors
- PAGELL, M., WU, Z., & WASSERMAN, M. E.
- Affiliations
- York University (CA)
- Oregon State University (US)
- Clarkson University (US)
- Venue
- Journal of Supply Chain Management
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2010-01
- Volume
- 46
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 57-73
- ISSN
- 1055-6001 (ISSN-L)
- 1523-2409
- 1745-493X
- OpenAlex
- W1760534880
- Cited by
- 411
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2026: 14 · 2025: 19 · 2024: 24 · 2023: 31 · 2022: 16 · 2021: 34 · 2020: 21 · 2019: 19 · 2018: 34 · 2017: 27 · 2016: 27 · 2015: 45 · 2014: 32 · 2013: 28 · 2012: 27
- FWCI
- 38.32
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of Supply Chain Management (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Strategy and Management › Sustainable Supply Chain Management
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Management Information Systems › Quality and Supply Management
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Management Information Systems › Supply Chain and Inventory Management
- Keywords
- sustainable sourcing, sustainable supply chain management, supply management, strategic suppliers, supply chain management theory
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review