Cited by 479Arsenic contamination and mitigationWater Quality and Resources StudiesMine drainage and remediation techniques

Arsenic in Ground Water of the Western United States

Welch, Alan H., Lico, Michael S., Hughes, Jennifer L.·1988·Groundwater

Abstract

Natural occurrences of ground water with moderate (10 to 50 micrograms per liter) to high (greater than 50 micrograms per liter) concentrations of arsenic are common throughout much of the Western United States. High concentrations of arsenic are generally associated with one of four geochemical environments: (1) basin‐fill deposits of alluvial‐lacustrine origin, particularly in semiarid areas, (2) volcanic deposits, (3) geothermal systems, and (4) uranium and gold‐mining areas. These findings are based on an extensive literature review, compilation of unpublished reports and data, and the review of data bases containing more than 7,000 analyses of ground‐water samples for arsenic. In the first two environments, arsenic appears to be associated with sediments derived, in part, from volcanic rocks of intermediate to acidic composition. Dissolved arsenic concentrations in water from volcanic aquifers in the same regions, however, may be low (less than 10 micrograms per liter). Solid phases (minerals, amorphous solids, and sedimentary organic matter) that supply the dissolved arsenic have not been identified in most areas. Alluvial and lacustrine sedimentary deposits appear to be an important source of arsenic in volcanic areas (such as Lane County, Oregon) and in areas underlain by basin‐fill deposits (such as Carson Desert in Nevada and the Tulare Lake basin in California). Mobilization of arsenic in sedimentary aquifers may be, in part, a result of changes in the geochemical environment due to agricultural irrigation. In the deeper subsurface, elevated arsenic concentrations are associated with compaction caused by groundwater withdrawals.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1745-6584.1988.tb00397.x

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Welch, A. H., Lico, M. S., & Hughes, J. L.
Affiliations
United States Geological Survey (US)
Venue
Groundwater
Publisher
Wiley
Published
1988-05
Volume
26
Issue
3
Pages
333-347
ISSN
  • 0017-467X (ISSN-L)
  • 1745-6584
OpenAlex
W2027530170
Cited by
479
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 17 · 2021: 14 · 2020: 13 · 2019: 16 · 2018: 11 · 2017: 11 · 2016: 17 · 2015: 13 · 2014: 21 · 2013: 21 · 2012: 21
FWCI
4.90
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Ground Water (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Environmental Chemistry › Arsenic contamination and mitigation
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Water Science and Technology › Water Quality and Resources Studies
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Environmental Chemistry › Mine drainage and remediation techniques
Keywords
arsenic, groundwater contamination, volcanic aquifers, geothermal systems, arsenic mobilization, agricultural irrigation, American West

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review