The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Use of Multiple Isotope Tracers to Evaluate Denitrification in Ground Water: Study of Nitrate from a Large‐Flux Septic System Plume
Abstract
This study explores the use of multiple isotopic tracers to evaluate the processes involved in nitrate attenuation in ground water. δ 15 N and δ 18 O are used to provide information about the role of denitrification on nitrate attenuation, and δ 34 S, δ 18 O, and δ 13 C are used to evaluate the role of reduced sulfur and carbon as electron donors for nitrate reduction. The focus of this study is a zone of significant NO 3 −1 attenuation occurring in a sand aquifer impacted by septic system contamination. The NO 3 −1 pattern, the ground water flow system, and changes in other chemical parameters suggest that the NO 3 −1 depletion is caused by denitrification. This is supported by the nitrate δ 15 N and δ 18 O data which both show significant isotopic enrichment as NO 3 −1 depletion proceeds along the flow path. The increase of sulfate and dissolved inorganic carbon observed in the zone of nitrate attenuation suggests that reduced sulfur in addition to carbon is also involved in denitrification. This is supported by a trend toward depleted sulfate δ 34 S and δ 18 O values in the zone of sulfate increase, which reflects the input of sulfate formed by the oxidation of biogenic pyrite present in the aquifer sediments. The trend toward depleted δ 13 values in the zone of increasing dissolved inorganic carbon reflects the input of organic carbon into this carbon pool. Chemical mass balance indicates that carbon is the dominant electron donor; however, this study demonstrates the effectiveness of using multiple isotopic tracers for providing insight into the processes affecting nitrate attenuation in ground water.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Elsner, M. (2010) · Journal of Environmental Monitoring · doi:10.1039/c0em00277a · Cited by 386
Long-term performance of in situ reactive barriers for nitrate remediation
Robertson, W. D., Blowes, D. W., Ptacek, C. J., & Cherry, J. A. (2000) · Groundwater · doi:10.1111/j.1745-6584.2000.tb02704.x · Cited by 247
Self-citationNitrate removal rates in a 15-year-old permeable reactive barrier treating septic system nitrate
Robertson, W. D., Vogan, J. L., & Lombardo, P. S. (2008) · Groundwater Monitoring & Remediation · doi:10.1111/j.1745-6592.2008.00205.x · Cited by 160
Self-citationFate of effluent-borne contaminants beneath septic tank drainfields overlying a karst aquifer
Katz, B. G., Griffin, D. W., McMahon, P. B., Harden, H. S., Wade, E., Hicks, R. W., & Chanton, J. P. (2010) · Journal of Environmental Quality · doi:10.2134/jeq2009.0244 · Cited by 115
Persistence of artificial sweeteners in a 15-year-old septic system plume
Robertson, W. D., Van Stempvoort, D. R., Solomon, D. K., Homewood, J., Brown, S. J., Spoelstra, J., & Schiff, S. L. (2013) · Journal of Hydrology · doi:10.1016/j.jhydrol.2012.10.048 · Cited by 100
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Aravena, R., & Robertson, W. D.
- Venue
- Groundwater
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 1998-11
- Volume
- 36
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 975-982
- ISSN
- 0017-467X (ISSN-L)
- 1745-6584
- OpenAlex
- W1969799349
- Cited by
- 556
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 15.45
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Use of Multiple Isotope Tracers to Evaluate Denitrification in Ground Water: Study of Nitrate from a Large‐Flux Septic System Plume. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1745-6584.1998.tb02104.x
- The paper
- Aravena, R., & Robertson, W. D. (1998). Use of Multiple Isotope Tracers to Evaluate Denitrification in Ground Water: Study of Nitrate from a Large‐Flux Septic System Plume. Groundwater. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-6584.1998.tb02104.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.