Cited by 115Karst Systems and HydrogeologyPharmaceutical and Antibiotic Environmental ImpactsGroundwater and Isotope Geochemistry

Fate of effluent-borne contaminants beneath septic tank drainfields overlying a karst aquifer

Katz, Brian G., Griffin, Dale W., McMahon, Peter B., Harden, Harmon S., Wade, Edgar, Hicks, Richard W., Chanton, Jeffrey P.·2010·Journal of Environmental Quality

Abstract

Groundwater quality effects from septic tanks were investigated in the Woodville Karst Plain, an area that contains numerous sinkholes and a thin veneer of sands and clays overlying the Upper Floridan aquifer (UFA). Concerns have emerged about elevated nitrate concentrations in the UFA, which is the source of water supply in this area of northern Florida. At three sites during dry and wet periods in 2007-2008, water samples were collected from the septic tank, shallow and deep lysimeters, and drainfield and background wells in the UFA and analyzed for multiple chemical indicators including nutrients, nitrate isotopes, organic wastewater compounds (OWCs), pharmaceutical compounds, and microbiological indicators (bacteria and viruses). Median NO3-N concentration in groundwater beneath the septic tank drainfields was 20 mg L(-1) (8.0-26 mg L(-1)). After adjusting for dilution, about 25 to 40% N loss (from denitrification, ammonium sorption, and ammonia volatilization) occurs as septic tank effluent moves through the unsaturated zone to the water table. Nitrogen loading rates to groundwater were highly variable at each site (3.9-12 kg N yr(-1)), as were N and chloride depth profiles in the unsaturated zone. Most OWCs and pharmaceutical compounds were highly attenuated beneath the drainfields; however, five Cs (caffeine, 1,7-dimethylxanthine, phenol, galaxolide, and tris(dichloroisotopropyl)phosphate) and two pharmaceutical compounds (acetaminophen and sulfamethoxazole) were detected in groundwater samples. Indicator bacteria and human enteric viruses were detected in septic tank effluent samples but only intermittently in soil water and groundwater. Contaminant movement to groundwater beneath each septic tank system also was related to water use and differences in lithology at each site.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2134/jeq2009.0244

Cites

62 of 62 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Several organic wastewater compounds detected in the Nebraska wells but not in the Cape Cod wells (acetaminophen, caffeine, paraxanthine) are well-removed in septic system leach fields and typically only persist in anoxic groundwater.

    “Several OWCs detected in the Nebraska wells but not in the Cape Cod wells (acetaminophen, caffeine, paraxanthine) are well-removed in septic system leach fields (Wilcox et al., 2009;Katz et al., 2010) and typically only persist in anoxic groundwater (Swartz et al., 2006).”
  • The median concentration of total N (NO3-+NH4+) in landfill leachate was 82 mg/L, which is only around twice typical TN concentrations in septic tank effluent.

    “The median [B] in a study of landfill leachate was 4700 μg/L (Clark and Piskin, 1977), which is ~20 times higher than septic tank effluent (Swartz et al., 2006), whereas the median concentration of total N (NO 3 -+ NH 4 + ) was 82 mg/L (Clark and Piskin, 1977), which is only around twice typical TN concentrations in septic tank effluent (Katz et al., 2010).”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Katz, B. G., Griffin, D. W., McMahon, P. B., Harden, H. S., Wade, E., Hicks, R. W., & Chanton, J. P.
Affiliations
  • United States Geological Survey (US)
  • Florida State University (US)
  • Florida Department of Environmental Protection (US)
Corresponding author
Katz, Brian G.
Venue
Journal of Environmental Quality
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2010-07
Volume
39
Issue
4
Pages
1181-1195
ISSN
  • 0047-2425 (ISSN-L)
  • 1537-2537
OpenAlex
W1987356532
Cited by
115
References
62
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 10 · 2017: 10 · 2016: 12 · 2015: 11 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 6
FWCI
6.82
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Environmental Quality (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
U.S. Geological Survey
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Earth-Surface Processes › Karst Systems and Hydrogeology
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Pollution › Pharmaceutical and Antibiotic Environmental Impacts
  • Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Geochemistry and Petrology › Groundwater and Isotope Geochemistry
Keywords
septic systems, drainfield, karst aquifers, Upper Floridan aquifer, nitrate contamination, nitrogen loss, denitrification, pharmaceutical compounds, caffeine, galaxolide, indicator bacteria, enteric viruses, vadose zone, groundwater quality, nitrogen loading, wastewater effluent
MeSH terms
Quaternary Ammonium Compounds, Pharmaceutical Preparations, Nitrates, Nitrogen, Sanitary Engineering, Soil, Soil Pollutants, Waste Disposal, Fluid, Water, Water Pollutants, Chemical

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review