Cited by 893Arsenic contamination and mitigationGeochemistry and Elemental AnalysisMine drainage and remediation techniques

Arsenic in Ground Water of the United States: Occurrence and Geochemistry

Open access
Welch, Alan H., Westjohn, D.B., Helsel, Dennis R., Wanty, Richard B.·2000·Groundwater

Abstract

Concentrations of naturally occurring arsenic in ground water vary regionally due to a combination of climate and geology. Although slightly less than half of 30,000 arsenic analyses of ground water in the United States were 1 μg/L, about 10% exceeded 10 μg/L. At a broad regional scale, arsenic concentrations exceeding 10 μg/L appear to be more frequently observed in the western United States than in the eastern half. Arsenic concentrations in ground water of the Appalachian Highlands and the Atlantic Plain generally are very low ( 1 μg/L). Concentrations are somewhat greater in the Interior Plains and the Rocky Mountain System. Investigations of ground water in New England, Michigan, Minnesota, South Dakota, Oklahoma, and Wisconsin within the last decade suggest that arsenic concentrations exceeding 10 μg/L are more widespread and common than previously recognized. Arsenic release from iron oxide appears to be the most common cause of widespread arsenic concentrations exceeding 10 μg/L in ground water. This can occur in response to different geochemical conditions, including release of arsenic to ground water through reaction of iron oxide with either natural or anthropogenic (i.e., petroleum products) organic carbon. Iron oxide also can release arsenic to alkaline ground water, such as that found in some felsic volcanic rocks and alkaline aquifers of the western United States. Sulfide minerals are both a source and sink for arsenic. Geothermal water and high evaporation rates also are associated with arsenic concentrations 10g/L in ground and surface water, particularly in the west.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1745-6584.2000.tb00251.x

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Welch, A. H., Westjohn, D. B., Helsel, D. R., & Wanty, R. B.
Affiliations
United States Geological Survey (US)
Venue
Groundwater
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2000-07
Volume
38
Issue
4
Pages
589-604
ISSN
  • 0017-467X (ISSN-L)
  • 1745-6584
OpenAlex
W1985879113
Cited by
893
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 15 · 2025: 17 · 2024: 23 · 2023: 15 · 2022: 34 · 2021: 37 · 2020: 43 · 2019: 46 · 2018: 49 · 2017: 39 · 2016: 38 · 2015: 36 · 2014: 56 · 2013: 43 · 2012: 33
FWCI
18.19
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
Ground Water (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Environmental Chemistry › Arsenic contamination and mitigation
  • Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Geochemistry and Petrology › Geochemistry and Elemental Analysis
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Environmental Chemistry › Mine drainage and remediation techniques
Keywords
arsenic, groundwater contamination, naturally occurring arsenic, arsenic geochemistry, iron oxide reduction, organic carbon, sulfide minerals, alkaline groundwater, felsic volcanic rock, geothermal water, evaporation, regional variation, American West, eastern United States

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review