Cited by 140Landfill Environmental Impact StudiesGroundwater and Isotope GeochemistryGroundwater flow and contamination studies

Biogeochemical evolution of a landfill leachate plume, Norman, Oklahoma

Cozzarelli, I.M., Böhlke, J.K., Masoner, J., Breit, G.N., Lorah, M.M., Tuttle, M.L.W., Jaeschke, J.B.·2011·Groundwater

Abstract

Leachate from municipal landfills can create groundwater contaminant plumes that may last for decades to centuries. The fate of reactive contaminants in leachate-affected aquifers depends on the sustainability of biogeochemical processes affecting contaminant transport. Temporal variations in the configuration of redox zones downgradient from the Norman Landfill were studied for more than a decade. The leachate plume contained elevated concentrations of nonvolatile dissolved organic carbon (NVDOC) (up to 300 mg/L), methane (16 mg/L), ammonium (650 mg/L as N), iron (23 mg/L), chloride (1030 mg/L), and bicarbonate (4270 mg/L). Chemical and isotopic investigations along a 2D plume transect revealed consumption of solid and aqueous electron acceptors in the aquifer, depleting the natural attenuation capacity. Despite the relative recalcitrance of NVDOC to biodegradation, the center of the plume was depleted in sulfate, which reduces the long-term oxidation capacity of the leachate-affected aquifer. Ammonium and methane were attenuated in the aquifer relative to chloride by different processes: ammonium transport was retarded mainly by physical interaction with aquifer solids, whereas the methane plume was truncated largely by oxidation. Studies near plume boundaries revealed temporal variability in constituent concentrations related in part to hydrologic changes at various time scales. The upper boundary of the plume was a particularly active location where redox reactions responded to recharge events and seasonal water-table fluctuations. Accurately describing the biogeochemical processes that affect the transport of contaminants in this landfill-leachate-affected aquifer required understanding the aquifer's geologic and hydrodynamic framework.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1745-6584.2010.00792.x

Cites

57 of 57 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Cozzarelli, I. M., Böhlke, J. K., Masoner, J., Breit, G. N., Lorah, M. M., Tuttle, M. L. W., & Jaeschke, J. B.
Affiliations
United States Geological Survey (US)
Corresponding author
Cozzarelli, I.M.
Venue
Groundwater
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2011-02-11
Volume
49
Issue
5
Pages
663-687
ISSN
  • 0017-467X (ISSN-L)
  • 1745-6584
OpenAlex
W2098164803
Cited by
140
References
57
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 32 · 2018: 9 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 9 · 2015: 11 · 2014: 11 · 2013: 9 · 2012: 7
FWCI
19.23
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Ground Water (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Waste Management and Disposal › Landfill Environmental Impact Studies
  • Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Geochemistry and Petrology › Groundwater and Isotope Geochemistry
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Environmental Engineering › Groundwater flow and contamination studies
Keywords
landfill leachate, groundwater contaminant plumes, redox zonation, methane oxidation, ammonium transport, sulfate depletion, natural attenuation, electron acceptors, chloride, bicarbonate, isotope tracers, aquifer hydrodynamics, groundwater level fluctuation
MeSH terms
Environmental Monitoring, Oklahoma, Refuse Disposal, Water Pollutants, Chemical, Groundwater

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review