The DOI matches its Crossref record; 24 of the 24 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
THE INFLUENCE OF DELINQUENT PEERS: WHAT THEY THINK OR WHAT THEY DO?*
Abstract
Although the association between delinquent friends and delinquent behavior is well established, the mechanism by which delinquency is socially transmitted remains unclear. Sutherlands theory of differential association holds that delinquency is a consequence of attitudes favorable to the violation of the law, attitudes that are acquired through intimate social interaction with peers. An analysis of data from the National Youth Survey indicates that peer attitudes do affect delinquency. But the effect of peers'attitudes is small in comparison to that of peers behavior, and the effect of peers'behavior remains strong even when peers, attitudes and the adolescent's own attitude are controlled. Moreover, when the behavior and attitudes of peers are inconsistent, the behavior of peers appears to outweigh or override the attitudes of peers. These findings suggest that delinquency is not primarily a consequence of attitudes acquired from peers. Rather, it more likely stems from other social learning mechanisms, such as imitation or vicarious reinforcement, or from group pressures to conform.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“To the extent that behavior and attitudes are mutually reinforcing in general (e.g., Bem 1970;Festinger 1964), and for deviant behavior in particular (e.g., Warr and Stafford 1991), a full picture of the role of religion in controlling crime and deviance needs to assess religion's affect on both attitudes and behavior.”
From The Effect of Religiosity on Tax Fraud Acceptability: A Cross‐National Analysis (2006) · cites this paper as Warr and Stafford 1991
Citations
Cites
Social Change and Crime Rate Trends: A Routine Activity Approach
Cohen, L. E., & Felson, M. (1979) · Routledge eBooks · doi:10.4324/9781439817803-12 · Cited by 9,859
Social Change and Crime Rate Trends: A Routine Activity Approach
Cohen, L. E., & Felson, M. (1979) · American Sociological Review · doi:10.2307/2094589 · Cited by 8,856
Deviant behavior;: A social learning approach
Akers, R. L. (1973) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 1,920
Explaining Delinquency and Drug Use.
Liska, A. E., Elliott, D. S., Huzinga, D., & Ageton, S. S. (1986) · Contemporary Sociology A Journal of Reviews · doi:10.2307/2069276 · Cited by 1,683
Social Learning and Deviant Behavior: A Specific Test of a General Theory
Akers, R. L., Krohn, M. D., Lanza‐Kaduce, L., & Radosevich, M. (1995) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-1-4757-9829-6_12 · Cited by 1,200
Social Learning and Deviant Behavior: A Specific Test of a General Theory
Akers, R. L., Krohn, M. D., Lanza‐Kaduce, L., & Radosevich, M. (1979) · American Sociological Review · doi:10.2307/2094592 · Cited by 1,180
Reconciling Race and Class Differences in Self-Reported and Official Estimates of Delinquency
Elliott, D. S., & Ageton, S. S. (1980) · American Sociological Review · doi:10.2307/2095245 · Cited by 937
Group Process and Gang Delinquency.
Bordua, D. J., Short, J. F., & Strodtbeck, F. L. (1966) · American Sociological Review · doi:10.2307/2091324 · Cited by 681
Paternoster, R. (1987) · Justice Quarterly · doi:10.1080/07418828700089271 · Cited by 619
Matsueda, R. L., & Heimer, K. (1987) · American Sociological Review · doi:10.2307/2095837 · Cited by 481
Research works printed but not linked: 4
- Erickson Maynard L., 1965, Class position, peers, and delinquency., Sociology and Social Research, 49, 268
- Johnson Richard E., 1979, Juvenile Delinquency and Its Origins
- Sutherland Edwin H., 1947, Criminology
- 10.1525/sp.1964.12.1.03a00080 · DOI
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Adolescence-limited and life-course-persistent antisocial behavior: a developmental taxonomy
Moffitt, T. E. (1993) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/0033-295x.100.4.674 · Cited by 9,987
THE EMPIRICAL STATUS OF GOTTFREDSON AND HIRSCHI'S GENERAL THEORY OF CRIME: A META‐ANALYSIS
Pratt, T. C., & Cullen, F. T. (2000) · Criminology · doi:10.1111/j.1745-9125.2000.tb00911.x · Cited by 2,052
Companions in Crime: The Social Aspects of Criminal Conduct
Warr, M. (2002) · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511803956 · Cited by 1,122
Self-citationDelinquent Peers Revisited: Does Network Structure Matter?
Haynie, D. L. (2001) · American Journal of Sociology · doi:10.1086/320298 · Cited by 1,014
Companions in Crime: The Social Aspects of Criminal Conduct
Akers, R. L., & Warr, M. (2003) · Contemporary Sociology A Journal of Reviews · doi:10.2307/3089208 · Cited by 866
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- WARR, M., & STAFFORD, M.
- Affiliations
- The University of Texas at Austin (US)
- Washington State University (US)
- Venue
- Criminology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 1991-11
- Volume
- 29
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 851-866
- ISSN
- 0011-1384 (ISSN-L)
- 1745-9125
- OpenAlex
- W2101472231
- Cited by
- 481
- References
- 24
- Citations by year
- 2026: 5 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 14 · 2020: 18 · 2019: 17 · 2018: 16 · 2017: 18 · 2016: 20 · 2015: 21 · 2014: 19 · 2013: 22 · 2012: 20
- FWCI
- 19.13
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Criminology (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Crime Patterns and Interventions
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Crime, Deviance, and Social Control
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Bullying, Victimization, and Aggression
- Keywords
- juvenile delinquency, peer influence, differential association, peer attitudes, peer behavior, social learning, imitation, vicarious reinforcement, group conformity
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review