Cited by 8,856Crime Patterns and InterventionsCriminal Justice and PenologyCrime, Deviance, and Social Control

Social Change and Crime Rate Trends: A Routine Activity Approach

Cohen, Lawrence E., Felson, Marcus·1979·American Sociological Review

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2307/2094589

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • According to lifestyles/routine activity theory, organizational structures and social routines present opportunities for motivated offenders to come into contact with potential targets.

    “According to the lifestyles/routine activity theory framework (Cohen and Felson 1979;Hindelang et al. 1978), organizational structures and social routines present opportunities for motivated offenders to come into contact with potential targets.”
  • Routine Activity Theory can explain how offenders exploit the convergence of targets and a lack of capable guardianship in poorly moderated VR spaces.

    “For instance, theories like Routine Activity Theory (Cohen & Felson, 1979) can explain how offenders exploit the convergence of targets and a lack of capable guardianship in poorly moderated VR spaces.”
  • The Routine Activity Approach offers a situational explanation for how OSG opportunities emerge, emphasizing the convergence of a motivated offender, a suitable target, and the absence of capable guardians.

    “Similarly, the Routine Activity Approach (Cohen & Felson, 1979) offers a situational explanation for how OSG opportunities emerge, emphasizing the convergence of a motivated offender, a suitable target, and the absence of capable guardians.”
  • Routine activity theory holds that crime occurs when a motivated offender converges with a suitable target in the absence of a capable guardian.

    “routine activity theory, which holds that crime occurs when a motivated offender converges with a suitable target in the absence of a capable guardian [11]”
  • Crimes, particularly violent crimes, tend to take place on specific street segments where there is an optimal combination of possible offenders, targets, and supervision.

    “Studies of criminal activity repeatedly show that crimes, particularly violent crimes, tend to take place on specific street segments where there is an optimal combination of possible offenders, targets, and supervision (Braga, Papachristos, and Hureau 2010;Cohen and Felson 1979;St. Jean 2008).”

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Cohen, L. E., & Felson, M.
Venue
American Sociological Review
Published
1979-08
Volume
44
Issue
4
Pages
588
ISSN
0003-1224 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4249855545
Cited by
8,856
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 716 · 2025: 559 · 2024: 563 · 2023: 531 · 2022: 614 · 2021: 576 · 2020: 540 · 2019: 479 · 2018: 468 · 2017: 395 · 2016: 390 · 2015: 352 · 2014: 296 · 2013: 335 · 2012: 280
FWCI
52.04
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
American Sociological Review (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Crime Patterns and Interventions
  • Social Sciences › Law › Criminal Justice and Penology
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Crime, Deviance, and Social Control
Keywords
social change, routine activity theory, crime victimization, victim-offender overlap

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review