Cited by 173Crime Patterns and InterventionsPolicing Practices and PerceptionsCriminal Justice and Penology

MEASUREMENT ERROR IN CALLS‐FOR‐SERVICE AS AN INDICATOR OF CRIME*

Open access
KLINGER, DAVID A., BRIDGES, GEORGE S.·1997·Criminology

Abstract

Several recent studies have used records of calls‐for‐service (CFS) to police 911 centers to measure crime at the address, neighborhood, and city level. This article examines the limitations of this “new” indicator of crime. After pointing out several types of error in dispatch records, we use data from an observational study of policing in 60 neighborhoods to examine empirically how these errors might bias CFS‐based crime counts and discuss the consequences of such bias. We conclude with suggestions for future research on the validity of CFS as an indicator of crime.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1745-9125.1997.tb01236.x

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Call takers and dispatchers share cautious sentiment and err toward assuming danger when caller information is ambiguous, leading to overuse of police in emergency response.

    “That cautious sentiment is shared by call takers and dispatchers who err toward assuming danger when the information provided by a caller is ambiguous, leading to overuse of police in emergency response (Gillooly, 2020;Klinger & Bridges, 1997).”

    From Diverting 911 calls: Lessons from early adopting urban jurisdictions (2024) · cites this paper as Klinger & Bridges, 1997

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
KLINGER, D. A., & BRIDGES, G. S.
Affiliations
  • University of Houston (US)
  • University of Washington (US)
Venue
Criminology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
1997-11
Volume
35
Issue
4
Pages
705-726
ISSN
  • 0011-1384 (ISSN-L)
  • 1745-9125
OpenAlex
W2020651490
Cited by
173
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 9 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 16 · 2021: 20 · 2020: 11 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 8 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 9 · 2012: 4
FWCI
9.45
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
Criminology (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • U.S. Department of Justice
  • Office of Justice Programs
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Crime Patterns and Interventions
  • Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Policing Practices and Perceptions
  • Social Sciences › Law › Criminal Justice and Penology
Keywords
calls for service, crime measurement, measurement error, crime counts, neighborhood crime

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review