The DOI matches its Crossref record; its reference list is not available.
POLICE SUBCULTURE RECONSIDERED
Abstract
Most comprehensive discussions of the police acknowledge the inability of legal and bureaucratic regulations to determine officer behavior. Attention is turned instead toward the informal norms developed within the police subculture. These discussions, however, tend to overstress the chasm between the formal and informal. They also provide inadequate tools for understanding differentiation, conflict, and change within police departments. I address these shortcomings here by mobilizing a particular conceptualization of the term “normative order”—as a set of rules and practices oriented around a central value. Six such orders are crucial to policing: law, bureaucratic control, adventure/machismo, safety, competence, and morality. I illustrate the importance of each by drawing upon ethnographic observations of the Los Angeles Police Department, and explain how my conceputalization offers a comprehensive yet flexible means to understand the social world of policing.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“a major contributing factor to patterns of police officers ' attitudes and behaviors, including the use of force, complaints against the police, or injuries in the line of duty, is the institutional subculture (Blau and Blau 1982; Galliher 1971; Herbert 1998; Sherman 1980; Waddington 1999).”
From Paradoxical effects of self-awareness of being observed: testing the effect of police body-worn cameras on assaults and aggression against officers (2018) · cites this paper as Herbert 1998
Citations
No citation lists for this paper
No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.
References 55 · Cited by 390
Research works printed but not linked: 73
- 10.7312/alex94474 · DOI
- Appier, 1990, Juvenile crime control: Los Angeles law enforcement and the zoot‐suit‐riots, Criminal Justice History, 11, 147
- Archer, 1988, Culture and Agency: The Place of Culture in Social Theory
- Banton, 1964, The Policeman in the Community
- 10.2307/1191686 · DOI
- 10.2307/2092019 · DOI · Paper page
- Black, 1980, The Manner and Customs of the Police
- Brown, 1981, Working the Street: Police Discretion and the Dilemmas of Reform
- Cain, 1973, Society and the Policeman's Role
- Chambliss, 1994, Policing the ghetto underclass: The politics of law and law enforcement, Social Problems, 41, 177, 10.2307/3096929 · DOI
- 10.1017/CBO9780511518195 · DOI · Paper page
- Chevigny, 1969, 1995 Edge of the Knife: Police Violence in the Americas
- Coser, 1956, The Functions of Social Conflict
- Dahrendorf, 1959, Class and Class Conflict in Industrial Society
- Davis, 1990, City of Quartz: Excavating the Future in Los Angeles
- DiMaggio, 1991, The New Institutionalism in Organizational Analysis
- Domanick, 1994, To Protect and to Serve: The LAPD's Century of War in the City of Dreams
- Douglas, 1966, 1973 Natural Symbols
- 10.2307/2080213 · DOI
- Fielding, 1994, Just Boys Doing Business? Men, Masculinities and Crime
- Fogelson, 1971, The Politics of Riot Commissions, 1917–1970
- Gamson, 1992, Talking Politics
- Garfinkel, 1967, Studies in Ethnomethodology
- Gouldner, 1970, The Coming Crisis of Western Sociology
- Graef, 1989, Talking Blues
- Greene, 1994, The Challenge of Community Policing: Testing the Promises
- Grimshaw, 1987, Interpreting Police work
- Hannerz, 1992, Cultural Complexity
- Heidensohn, 1992, Women in Control? The Role of Women in Law Enforcement
- Herbert, 1996, Policing Space: Territoriality and the Los Angeles Police Department
- Herbert, 1997, Morality in law enforcement: Chasing “bad guys” with the Los Angeles Police Department, 799
- Heritage, 1984, Garfinkel and Ethnomethodology
- 10.1007/BF00139892 · DOI
- 10.2307/2094265 · DOI
- Independent Commission on the Los Angeles Police Department, 1991, Report
- Kappeler, 1994, Forces of Deviance: Understanding the Dark Side of Policing
- Kelling, 1996, Fixing Broken Windows: Restoring Order and Reducing Crime in Our Communities
- Manning, 1977, Police Work
- Manning, 1980, The Narcs' Game: Organizational and Informational Limits on Drug Law Enforcement, 10.1007/BF02694808 · DOI
- Manning, 1989, Encyclopedia of Police Science
- Manning, 1994, Inequality, Crime and Social Control
- 10.1111/j.1745-9125.1995.tb01189.x · DOI
- McBarnet, 1979, The British Police
- Muir, 1977, Police: Street corner Politicians
- Neiderhoffer, 1967, Behind the Shield: The Police in Urban Society
- Ortner, 1994, Culture/Power/History: A Reader in Contemporary Social Theory
- 10.1146/annurev.so.11.080185.002325 · DOI
- Parsons, 1937, The Social System
- Pate, 1991, The Big Six: Policing America's Largest Cities
- Reiner, 1978, The Politics of the Police
- Reuss‐Ianni, 1983, Two Cultures of Policing
- 10.4324/9780203002100 · DOI
- Ritti, 1994, The Ropes to Skip and the Ropes to Know: Studies in Organizational Behavior
- Rubenstein, 1973, City Police
- Sackmann, 1991, Cultural Knowledge in Organizations: Exploring the Collective Mind
- 10.4135/9781483327006.n2 · DOI
- Sasson, 1995, Crime Talk: How Citizens Construct a Social Problem
- Schein, 1985, Organizational Culture and Leadership
- Seidman, 1994, Contested Knowledge: Social Theory in the Postmodern Era
- 10.1086/229967 · DOI
- Shearing, 1981, Organizational Police Deviance
- 10.2307/591444 · DOI
- Skolnick, 1966, Justice Without Trial: Law Enforcement in a Democratic Society
- Skolnick, 1993, Above the Law: Police and the Excessive Use of Force
- Sparrow, 1990, Beyond 911: A New Era for Policing
- 10.2307/2095521 · DOI · Paper page
- Turner, 1968, The Police Establishment
- Van Maanen, 1974, The Potential for Reform of Criminal Justice
- Van Maanen, 1978, Policing: A View from the Street
- Westley, 1970, Violence and the Police: A Sociological Study of Law, Custom and Morality
- Lawrence Wieder D., 1970, Language and Social Reality: The Case of Telling the Convict Code
- 10.4159/9780674045200 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1146/annurev.so.14.080188.000405 · DOI
Metadata
- Authors
- HERBERT, S.
- Affiliations
- Indiana University Bloomington (US)
- Corresponding author
- HERBERT, STEVE
- Venue
- Criminology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 1998-05
- Volume
- 36
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 343-370
- ISSN
- 0011-1384 (ISSN-L)
- 1745-9125
- OpenAlex
- W1987850680
- Cited by
- 390
- References
- 55
- Citations by year
- 2026: 6 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 17 · 2023: 17 · 2022: 43 · 2021: 17 · 2020: 22 · 2019: 31 · 2018: 11 · 2017: 20 · 2016: 33 · 2015: 15 · 2014: 10 · 2013: 12 · 2012: 11
- FWCI
- 31.12
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Criminology (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Policing Practices and Perceptions
- Social Sciences › Law › Criminal Justice and Penology
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Crime, Deviance, and Social Control
- Keywords
- police subculture, normative order, informal norms, police behavior, bureaucratic control, machismo, police competence, police officer safety, police enforcement, Los Angeles Police Department, police culture
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: POLICE SUBCULTURE RECONSIDERED. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1745-9125.1998.tb01251.x
- The paper
- HERBERT, S. (1998). POLICE SUBCULTURE RECONSIDERED. Criminology. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-9125.1998.tb01251.x