Cited by 238Crime Patterns and InterventionsIntimate Partner and Family ViolenceCriminal Justice and Penology

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

THE VICTIM‐OFFENDER RELATIONSHIP AND CALLING THE POLICE IN ASSAULTS*

Abstract

The revised National Crime Victimization Survey is used to examine the effects of the victim's relationship to the offender on whether assaults are reported to the police by either the victim or by third parties. The results indicate that the offender‐victim relationship affects third‐party but not victim reporting. The former effect occurs in part because third parties are unlikely to witness assaults involving people in ongoing relationships, particularly couples, and in part because third parties are reluctant to report minor assaults (i.e., those assaults that involve a threat but no actual attack and no weapon). We discuss possible explanations for why no effect of relationship on victim reporting was found.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1745-9125.1999.tb00510.x

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 33

  1. 10.1177/0093854898025001002 · DOI
  2. Bachman Ronet, 1995, U.S. Department of Justice
  3. Baumgartner Mary P., 1988, The Moral Order of a Suburb
  4. Black Donald, 1976, The Behavior of Law
  5. 10.1111/j.1747-4469.1995.tb00693.x · DOI
  6. 10.1111/j.1745-9125.1974.tb00614.x · DOI
  7. 10.1177/089124393007001005 · DOI
  8. Bureau of Justice Statistics, 1992, Criminal Victimization in the United States‐1990. Department of Justice. Bureau of Justice Statistics
  9. Bureau of Justice Statistics, 1997, Criminal Victimization in the United States‐1994. Department of Justice. Bureau of Justice Statistics
  10. Bureau of Justice Statistics, 1997, Conducted by the Department of Commerce, Bureau of the Census, 1992
  11. 10.2307/3033920 · DOI
  12. 10.1016/B978-0-12-598226-9.50008-2 · DOI
  13. Frieze Irene H., 1989, Family Violence
  14. Garofalo James, 1990, Measuring Crime: Large‐Scale, Long‐Range Efforts
  15. Gartner Rosemary, 1995, The effect of victim‐offender relationship on reporting crimes of violence against women, CanadianJournal of Criminology, 37, 393, 10.3138/cjcrim.37.3.393 · DOI
  16. Gelles Richard J, 1983, The Dark Side of Familes
  17. Goldberg Martin S., 1992, After the Crime: Victim Decision Making
  18. Gottfredson Michael, 1980, Decision‐Making in Criminal Justice
  19. 10.2307/2094813 · DOI
  20. Kinderman Charles, 1997, Bureau of Justice Statistics Technical Report
  21. O'Brien Robert M., 1985, Crime and Victimization Data
  22. Pagelow Mildred D., 1984, Family Violence
  23. Perkins Craig A., 1996, Criminal Victimization in the United States‐1993. Bureau of Justice Statistics, U.S Department of Justice
  24. Reiss Albert, 1993, Understanding and Preventing Violence
  25. Rosenthal Abraham, 1964, Thirty‐Eight Witnesses
  26. 10.1177/0093854894021004003 · DOI
  27. Sellin Thorsten, 1964, The Measurement of Delinquency
  28. 10.1037/0022-3514.34.5.990 · DOI
  29. 10.1111/j.1745-9125.1976.tb00685.x · DOI
  30. 10.1177/0022427884021002003 · DOI
  31. Wesley Skogan., 1986, From Crime Policy to Victim Policy: Reorienting the Justice System
  32. Straus Murray A., 1980, Behind Closed Doors: Violence in the American Family
  33. 10.2307/2095649 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
FELSON, R. B., MESSNER, S. F., & HOSKIN, A.
Affiliations
  • Pennsylvania State University (US)
  • University at Albany, State University of New York (US)
Venue
Criminology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
1999-11
Volume
37
Issue
4
Pages
931-948
ISSN
  • 0011-1384 (ISSN-L)
  • 1745-9125
OpenAlex
W1973313883
Cited by
238
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 11 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 40 · 2016: 8 · 2015: 9 · 2014: 17 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 10
FWCI
10.16
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Criminology (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Crime Patterns and Interventions
  • Social Sciences › Health › Intimate Partner and Family Violence
  • Social Sciences › Law › Criminal Justice and Penology
Keywords
victim-offender relationship, third-party reporting, victim reporting, National Crime Victimization Survey, couples, relationship status, witness testimony, police calls

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review