Cited by 32Obesity, Physical Activity, DietSchool Health and Nursing EducationNutrition, Health and Food Behavior

Implementation of low-fat, low-sugar, and portion-controlled nutrition guidelines in competitive food venues of Maine public high schools

Whatley Blum, Janet E., Davee, Anne‐Marie, Devore, Rachel L., Beaudoin, Christina M., Jenkins, Paul L., Kaley, Lori A., Wigand, Debra A.·2007·Journal of School Health

Abstract

ABSTRACT Background: The prevalence of childhood “overweight” and “at risk for overweight” has become a major public health concern. School food environments can affect key nutritional risk factors, especially in high schools where foods of poor nutrient value are pervasive in à la carte and vending programs. This study examines à la carte and vending programs in Maine public high schools at baseline and following implementation of low‐fat (defined as items ≤30% of total calories from fat), low‐sugar (defined as items ≤35% of sugar by weight), and portion‐controlled (LFLS) guidelines. Methods: Four high schools implemented LFLS guidelines and 3 made no changes to à la carte and vending programs for a period of 1 school year. Results: Findings revealed no significant change in food and beverage offerings in control schools. Whereas, in intervention schools, the proportion of items meeting the LFLS nutrient criteria increased from 32.8% to 81.8% in à la carte items, increased from 22.5% to 84.0% in snack vending, and increased from 48.0% to 98.9% in beverage vending from baseline to follow‐up. However, these increases were mitigated when LFLS portion size criteria were applied. Conclusions: These findings demonstrate the successful implementation of LFLS guidelines similar to recommendations recently proposed by numerous organizations. School food service personnel were identified as key stakeholders in the successful implementation of the LFLS guidelines. Furthermore, these findings emphasize an important role the food and beverage industry will have in providing foods and beverages that meet proposed nutrient and portion guidelines.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1746-1561.2007.00252.x

Cites

22 of 22 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Whatley Blum, J. E., Davee, A., Devore, R. L., Beaudoin, C. M., Jenkins, P. L., Kaley, L. A., & Wigand, D. A.
Affiliations
  • University of Southern Maine (US)
  • State of Maine Department of Health and Human Services (US)
Venue
Journal of School Health
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2007-12
Volume
77
Issue
10
Pages
687-693
ISSN
  • 0022-4391 (ISSN-L)
  • 1746-1561
OpenAlex
W2100361477
Cited by
32
References
22
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2024: 3 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 3
FWCI
2.41
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of School Health (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
U.S. Public Health Service (03022)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Obesity, Physical Activity, Diet
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Speech and Hearing › School Health and Nursing Education
  • Health Sciences › Nursing › Nutrition and Dietetics › Nutrition, Health and Food Behavior
Keywords
portion control, school food environment, high schools, childhood overweight, school nutrition policy, food and beverage industry, Maine
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Feeding Behavior, Food Dispensers, Automatic, Food Services, Humans, Maine, Prospective Studies, Schools, Case-Control Studies, Nutrition Policy, Diet, Fat-Restricted, Diet, Carbohydrate-Restricted

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review