Healthier Students Are Better Learners: High-Quality, Strategically Planned, and Effectively Coordinated School Health Programs Must Be a Fundamental Mission of Schools to Help Close the Achievement Gap
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To discuss implications for educational policy and practice relevant to closing the achievement gap based on the literature review and synthesis presented in 7 articles of the October 2011 special issue of the Journal of School Health. METHODS: Implications for closing the achievement gap are drawn from analyses of current literature. RESULTS: During the past several decades, school reform efforts to close the achievement gap have focused on various strategies, yielding very limited progress. Educationally relevant health disparities influence students' motivation and ability to learn, but reducing these disparities has been largely overlooked as an element of an overall strategy for closing the achievement gap. If these health problems are not addressed, the educational benefits of other school reform efforts will be jeopardized. CONCLUSIONS: Healthier students are better learners. School health programs and services that are evidence based, strategically planned to influence academic achievement, and effectively coordinated warrant validation as a cohesive school improvement initiative for closing the achievement gap. National, state, and local responsibilities for supporting school health are outlined, including shared strategies; leadership from the U.S. Department of Education; policy development; guidance, technical assistance, and professional development; accountability and data and software systems; and a research agenda. To date, the U.S. Department of Education has not provided leadership for integrating evidence-based, strategically planned, and effectively coordinated school health programs and services into the fundamental mission of schools. Now is an opportune time for change.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The connection between health and education supports the need for a comprehensive school health approach that is strategic, high quality, and coordinated.
“This important connection between health and education supports the need for a comprehensive school health approach that is strategic, high quality, and coordinated.”
From Critical connections: health and academics (2015) · cites this paper as [6]
Cites
Reframing school dropout as a public health issue.
(2007) · PubMed Central · Cited by 476 · see citing works
Sindre, G. M. (2017) · PCD Journal · doi:10.22146/pcd.25766 · Cited by 261 · see citing works
Race, Ethnicity, And The Education Gradient In Health
Kimbro, R. T., Bzostek, S. H., Goldman, N., & Rodrı́guez, G. (2008) · Health Affairs · doi:10.1377/hlthaff.27.2.361 · Cited by 205 · see citing works
Brener, N. D., Kann, L. K., McManus, T., et al. (2004) · Journal of School Health · doi:10.1111/j.1746-1561.2004.tb06616.x · Cited by 20 · see citing works
The Influence of ‘‘No Child Left Behind’’ Legislation on Drug Prevention in U.S. Schools
Cho, H., Hallfors, D. D., Iritani, B. J., & Hartman, S. (2009) · Evaluation Review · doi:10.1177/0193841x09335050 · Cited by 16 · see citing works
Student Connection Research: Final Narrative Report to the Spencer Foundation
Osher, D. M., Kendziora, K. T., & Chinen, M. (2008) · PsycEXTRA Dataset · doi:10.1037/e505552011-001 · Cited by 15 · see citing works
School Health: Policy and Practice
Malachowski, J. M. (1995) · Family & Community Health · doi:10.1097/00003727-199504000-00012 · Cited by 12 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Critical connections: health and academics
Michael, S. L., Merlo, C. L., Basch, C. E., Wentzel, K. R., & Wechsler, H. (2015) · Journal of School Health · doi:10.1111/josh.12309 · Cited by 222 · see citing works
Self-citationFaught, E. L., Gleddie, D., Storey, K. E., Davison, C. M., & Veugelers, P. J. (2017) · PLOS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0181938 · Cited by 95 · see citing works
- Authors
- Basch, C. E.
- Affiliations
- Columbia University (US)
- Corresponding author
- Basch, Charles E.
- ORCID
- Basch, Charles E.
- Venue
- Journal of School Health
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2011-09-16
- Volume
- 81
- Issue
- 10
- Pages
- 650-662
- ISSN
- 0022-4391 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2155431873
- Cited by
- 140
- References
- 7
- Citations by year
- 2026: 4 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 17 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 15 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 13 · 2017: 11 · 2016: 9 · 2015: 11 · 2014: 9 · 2013: 8 · 2012: 5
- FWCI
- 16.50
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of School Health (publishedVersion, public-domain)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › Speech and Hearing › School Health and Nursing Education
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Public Health Policies and Education
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Child and Adolescent Health
- Keywords
- school health programs, achievement gap, health disparities, academic performance, educational reform, education policy, health and learning, school improvement
- MeSH terms
- Achievement, Adolescent, Adolescent Behavior, Child, Child Welfare, Cognition, Educational Status, Health Planning, Health Promotion, Health Status, Humans, Leadership, Learning, Organizations, School Health Services, Schools, Students, United States, Health Status Disparities
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review