Die Logik nicht gleichzeitig entscheidbarer Aussagen
Abstract
Das der Arbeit vorangestellte Motto ist der Untertitel des Kapitels La physique de l’objet quelconque aus dem Werk Les mathematiques et la realite; diese Physik erweist sich im wesentlichen als eine Form der klassischen Aussagenlogik, welche so einerseits eine typische Realisation erhalt und sich anderseits auf fast selbstverstandliche Art des Absolutheitsanspruches entkleidet findet, mit dem sie zeitweise behangt wurde. Die folgenden Ausfuhrungen schliessen sich an diese Betrachtungsweise an und mochten in demselben empirischen Sinn verstanden sein.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
No-go theorems for non-contextual hidden variables show a drastic difference between classical and quantum.
“Another class of theorems, which show the drastic difference between the classical and the quantum, are the no-go theorems for non-contextual hidden variables (NCHV) interpretations of quantum mechanics [Specker, 1960;Bell, 1966;Kochen and Specker, 1967;Mermin, 1990c; for a survey, see (Mermin, 1993)].”
From Multiphoton entanglement and interferometry (2012) · cites this paper as Specker, 1960
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Multiphoton entanglement and interferometry
Pan, J.-W., Chen, Z.-B., Lu, C.-Y., Weinfurter, H., Zeilinger, A., & Żukowski, M. (2012) · Reviews of Modern Physics · doi:10.1103/revmodphys.84.777 · Cited by 1,410 · see citing works
- Authors
- Specker, E.
- Corresponding author
- Specker, Ernst
- Venue
- Dialectica
- Publisher
- Verein philosophie.ch
- Published
- 1960
- Volume
- 14
- Issue
- 54/55
- Pages
- 239-246
- ISSN
- 0012-2017 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2141330794
- Cited by
- 273
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 4 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 13 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 13 · 2018: 15 · 2017: 16 · 2016: 16 · 2015: 15 · 2014: 25 · 2013: 16 · 2012: 17
- FWCI
- 0.00
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- dialectica (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computational Theory and Mathematics › Advanced Algebra and Logic
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Logic, Reasoning, and Knowledge
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › History and Philosophy of Science › Philosophy, Science, and History
- Keywords
- classical propositional logic, undecidability, philosophy of mathematics, philosophy of logic
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
