The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
A Systematic Review of Perceived Barriers and Motivators to Physical Activity after Stroke
Open accessAbstract
Background and purpose: Physical fitness is impaired after stroke, may contribute to disability, yet is amenable to improvement through regular physical activity. To facilitate uptake and maintenance of physical activity, it is essential to understand stroke survivors' perceived barriers and motivators. Therefore, we undertook a systematic review of perceived barriers and motivators to physical activity after stroke. Methods: Electronic searches of EMBASE, Medline, CINAHL, and PsychInfo were performed. We included peer-reviewed journal articles, in English, between 1 January 1966 and 30 August 2010 reporting stroke survivors' perceived barriers and motivators to physical activity. Results: Searches identified 73 807 citations of which 57 full articles were retrieved. Six articles were included, providing data on 174 stroke survivors (range 10 to 83 per article). Two reported barriers and motivators, two reported only motivators, and two reported only barriers. Five were qualitative articles and one was quantitative. The most commonly reported barriers were lack of motivation, environmental factors (e.g. transport), health concerns, and stroke impairments. The most commonly reported motivators were social support and the need to be able to perform daily tasks. Conclusion: This review has furthered our understanding of the perceived barriers and motivators to physical activity after a stroke. This review will enable the development of tailored interventions to target barriers, while building upon perceived motivators to increase and maintain stroke survivors' physical activity.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Intrinsic and Extrinsic Motivations: Classic Definitions and New Directions
Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2000) · Contemporary Educational Psychology · doi:10.1006/ceps.1999.1020 · Cited by 18,666
Physical Activity and Stroke Risk: A Meta-Analysis
Lee, C. D., Folsom, A. R., & Blair, S. N. (2003) · Stroke · doi:10.1161/01.str.0000091843.02517.9d · Cited by 829
Physical fitness training for stroke patients
Saunders, D. H., Sanderson, M., Hayes, S., Kilrane, M., Greig, C. A., Brazzelli, M., & Mead, G. E. (2016) · Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews · doi:10.1002/14651858.cd003316.pub6 · Cited by 759
Self-citationHow Active Are People With Stroke?: Use of Accelerometers to Assess Physical Activity
Rand, D., Eng, J. J., Tang, P.-F., Jeng, J.-S., & Hung, C. (2009) · Stroke · doi:10.1161/strokeaha.108.523621 · Cited by 325
Bonetti, D., & Johnston, M. (2008) · British Journal of Health Psychology · doi:10.1348/135910707x216648 · Cited by 44
Cited by
Winstein, C. J., Stein, J., Arena, R., Bates, B., Cherney, L. R., Cramer, S. C., Deruyter, F., Eng, J. J., Fisher, B., Harvey, R. L., et al. (2016) · Stroke · doi:10.1161/str.0000000000000098 · Cited by 3,293
Billinger, S. A., Arena, R., Bernhardt, J., Eng, J. J., Franklin, B. A., Johnson, C. M., MacKay-Lyons, M., Macko, R. F., Mead, G. E., Roth, E. J., et al. (2014) · Stroke · doi:10.1161/str.0000000000000022 · Cited by 1,529
Self-citationMartin Ginis, K. A., Ma, J. K., Latimer-Cheung, A. E., & Rimmer, J. H. (2016) · Health Psychology Review · doi:10.1080/17437199.2016.1198240 · Cited by 462
Veldhuijzen van Zanten, J. J. C. S., Rouse, P. C., Hale, E. D., Ntoumanis, N., Metsios, G. S., Duda, J. L., & Kitas, G. D. (2015) · Sports Medicine · doi:10.1007/s40279-015-0363-2 · Cited by 259
Lidegaard, L. P., Schwennesen, N., Willaing, I., & Færch, K. (2016) · Diabetic Medicine · doi:10.1111/dme.13167 · Cited by 92
Metadata
- Authors
- Nicholson, S., Sniehotta, F. F., van Wijck, F., Greig, C. A., Johnston, M., McMurdo, M. E. T., Dennis, M., & Mead, G. E.
- Venue
- International Journal of Stroke
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2012-09-13
- Volume
- 8
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 357-364
- ISSN
- 1747-4930 (ISSN-L)
- 1747-4949
- OpenAlex
- W2127358238
- Cited by
- 319
- References
- 5
- FWCI
- 1.29
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A Systematic Review of Perceived Barriers and Motivators to Physical Activity after Stroke. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1747-4949.2012.00880.x
- The paper
- Nicholson, S., Sniehotta, F. F., van Wijck, F., Greig, C. A., Johnston, M., McMurdo, M. E. T., Dennis, M., & Mead, G. E. (2013). A Systematic Review of Perceived Barriers and Motivators to Physical Activity after Stroke. International Journal of Stroke. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1747-4949.2012.00880.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
