Cited by 92Physical Activity and HealthDiabetes Management and EducationMotivation and Self-Concept in Sports

Barriers to and motivators for physical activity among people with Type 2 diabetes: patients' perspectives

Lidegaard, L. P., Schwennesen, N., Willaing, I., Færch, K.·2016·Diabetic Medicine

Abstract

Aim: To explore barriers to and motivators for physical activity in a group of overweight and obese individuals with dysregulated Type 2 diabetes. Methods: Data were collected from the Steno Diabetes Center's outpatient clinic in Denmark. Four focus groups were conducted including 28 individuals with Type 2 diabetes aged 39–71 years. The facilitators used open‐ended questions and probes such as images, statements and quotations about physical activity to foster active participation and interaction among participants. Focus groups were recorded on video and the discussions were transcribed and analysed thematically. Results: We identified four main themes: 1) the body as a barrier to physical activity because of functional limitations; 2) logistical challenges, including lack of time and awareness of where to exercise in the local area; 3) being physically active with others, providing a sense of mutual commitment and enjoyment; and 4) goal‐setting and self‐tracking, which was seen as an opportunity to track physical improvement over time. Conclusions: The findings suggest that, once people are active, a high level of social interaction may help maintain their activity levels. Further research is needed to investigate the effect of combining individually tailored exercise plans with the establishment of customized and locally based exercise communities that offer enjoyment and support. Additionally, it is relevant to explore experiences of using self‐tracking technologies to review short‐ and long‐term goals.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/dme.13167

Cites

42 of 42 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Lidegaard, L. P., Schwennesen, N., Willaing, I., & Færch, K.
Affiliations
  • Steno Diabetes Center Gentofte Denmark
  • University of Copenhagen (DK)
Corresponding author
Færch, K.
Venue
Diabetic Medicine
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2016-07-09
Volume
33
Issue
12
Pages
1677-1685
ISSN
  • 0742-3071 (ISSN-L)
  • 1464-5491
OpenAlex
W2410973546
Cited by
92
References
42
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 17 · 2020: 11 · 2019: 13 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 1
FWCI
7.51
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Diabetic Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Research at the University of Copenhagen (University of Copenhagen) (submittedVersion)
Funders
Novo Nordisk Foundation
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Physical Activity and Health
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Management and Education
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Motivation and Self-Concept in Sports
Keywords
type 2 diabetes, physical activity, barriers to exercise, exercise motivation, overweight, obesity, functional limitations, social support, goal setting, self-tracking, exercise adherence, patient perspectives
MeSH terms
Adult, Aged, Attitude to Health, Denmark, Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2, Female, Humans, Interpersonal Relations, Male, Middle Aged, Motivation, Obesity, Exercise, Focus Groups, Overweight

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review