Cited by 37Primate Behavior and EcologyOlfactory and Sensory Function StudiesAnimal Behavior and Welfare Studies

Social communication by olfactory signals in marmosets

EPPLE, GISELA·1972·International Zoo Yearbook

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1748-1090.1972.tb02261.x

Cites

38 of 38 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The dense binding for V1aR in the OB of Callithrix is intriguing since marmosets utilize olfactory signals as a primary means of social communication.

    “The dense binding for V1aR in the OB of Callithrix is intriguing since marmosets utilize olfactory signals as a primary means of social communication (Epple, 1972; Smith et al., 2001; Ziegler, 2013).”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
EPPLE, G.
Affiliations
Monell Chemical Senses Center (US)
Corresponding author
EPPLE, GISELA
Venue
International Zoo Yearbook
Publisher
Wiley
Published
1972-01
Volume
12
Issue
1
Pages
36-42
ISSN
  • 0074-9664 (ISSN-L)
  • 1748-1090
OpenAlex
W2031113123
Cited by
37
References
38
Citations by year
2018: 1 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 1 · 2013: 2
FWCI
6.90
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
International Zoo Yearbook (publishedVersion)
Funders
National Science Foundation
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Primate Behavior and Ecology
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Sensory Systems › Olfactory and Sensory Function Studies
  • Health Sciences › Veterinary › Small Animals › Animal Behavior and Welfare Studies
Keywords
olfactory communication, scent marking, marmoset, social behavior, chemical cues, primate communication

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review