Cited by 26Primate Behavior and EcologyAnimal Behavior and Welfare StudiesAnimal Behavior and Reproduction

Analysis of factors that affect maternal behaviour and breeding success in great apes in captivity

ABELLO, M. T., COLELL, M.·2006·International Zoo Yearbook

Abstract

In this paper the relationship between maternal behaviour and breeding success (or failure) in great apes is described. Data were gathered from a questionnaire survey returned by 48 zoos and from available studbook data, giving a total sample size of 687 individuals [GorillasGorilla gorilla (n= 277), BonobosPan paniscus (n= 37), ChimpanzeesPan troglodytes (n= 216) and OrangutansPongo pygmaeus (n= 157)] born between 1990 and 2000 at 86 institutions. The factors influencing maternal behaviour are discussed. Particular attention is paid to the importance of learning and experience for the development of good maternal skills. The rearing background and social‐group circumstances of the breeding ♀ were analysed, including her rearing situation (own mother, conspecific surrogate or hand‐reared), opportunity (or not) to observe maternal behaviour in conspecifics during development and previous breeding experience. The effects of maternal training are also analysed. The results show that for a ♀ great ape to demonstrate good maternal skills, the most effective experience is to have been reared by her own mother and to have observed maternal behaviour in a social group comprising mature individuals and infants. This gives ♀♀ the opportunity to observe and learn how to care adequately for their own offspring.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1748-1090.2006.00323.x

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Breeding success has been the most frequent indicator for measuring animal welfare in captivity.

    “Breeding success has been the most frequent indicator for measuring animal welfare in captivity, as previously implemented for a range of taxa (primates: Abello and Colell, 2006; carnivores: Clubb and Mason, 2007; birds: Farrell et al., 2000; invertebrates: Wisniewski, 2000).”

    From Husbandry and enclosure influences on penguin behavior and conservation breeding (2016) · cites this paper as Abello and Colell, 2006

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
ABELLO, M. T., & COLELL, M.
Affiliations
Universitat de Barcelona (ES)
Venue
International Zoo Yearbook
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2006-06-22
Volume
40
Issue
1
Pages
323-340
ISSN
  • 0074-9664 (ISSN-L)
  • 1748-1090
OpenAlex
W2009272545
Cited by
26
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 1 · 2021: 2 · 2019: 1 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 1 · 2013: 4
FWCI
1.30
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
International Zoo Yearbook (publishedVersion)
Funders
Universitat de Barcelona
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Primate Behavior and Ecology
  • Health Sciences › Veterinary › Small Animals › Animal Behavior and Welfare Studies
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics › Animal Behavior and Reproduction
Keywords
maternal behavior, breeding success, great apes, captive breeding, gorillas, bonobos, chimpanzees, orangutans, maternal learning, social group composition, maternal training, hand-rearing, zoo animals

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review