The many uses of non-invasive faecal steroid monitoring in zoo and wildlife species
Abstract
During the past two decades, techniques for faecal steroid analysis have been developed and have been used for research with mammalian, bird and, to a lesser extent, reptile, amphibian and fish species. Various techniques for the analysis of reproductive (oestrogen, androgen, progestagen) and adrenocortical (glucocorticoids) steroid hormones have been established and have been applied to a wide range of research questions studying captive and free‐ranging wildlife, as well as domestic and laboratory species. Because of species‐specific differences in steroid metabolism in even closely related species, careful validation of assay methods is necessary in order to generate meaningful and accurate results. For future research and management of free‐ranging and captive wildlife, the great potential of non‐invasive endocrine monitoring will be utilized more than ever. In light of this, captive wildlife species are ideal research subjects, as longitudinal sample collection is possible and studies connecting physiology, endocrinology, reproduction and stress with various social and/or environmental factors can be carried out and can be analysed to determine how they impact animal health.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Analysing the excretion of GC metabolites in faeces is one way to evaluate physiological responses to environmental stressors.
“One way to evaluate physiological responses to environmental stressors is by analysing the excretion of GC metabolites in faeces (Schwarzenberger, 2007;Scarlata et al., 2013).”
From Effect of weather conditions and presence of visitors on adrenocortical activity in captive African penguins (Spheniscus demersus) (2017) · cites this paper as Schwarzenberger, 2007
Cites
Millspaugh, J. J., & Washburn, B. E. (2004) · General and Comparative Endocrinology · doi:10.1016/j.ygcen.2004.07.002 · Cited by 553 · see citing works
Wielebnowski, N. C., Fletchall, N., Carlstead, K., Busso, J. M., & Brown, J. L. (2002) · Zoo Biology · doi:10.1002/zoo.10005 · Cited by 344 · see citing works
Ganswindt, A., Rasmussen, H. B., Heistermann, M., & Hodges, J. K. (2005) · Hormones and Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.yhbeh.2004.09.002 · Cited by 115 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Watson, R., Munro, C., Edwards, K. L., Norton, V., Brown, J. L., & Walker, S. L. (2013) · General and Comparative Endocrinology · doi:10.1016/j.ygcen.2013.02.001 · Cited by 114 · see citing works
Ozella, L., Anfossi, L., Di Nardo, F., & Pessani, D. (2017) · General and Comparative Endocrinology · doi:10.1016/j.ygcen.2015.12.002 · Cited by 32 · see citing works
- Authors
- SCHWARZENBERGER, F.
- Affiliations
- University of Veterinary Medicine Vienna (AT)
- Corresponding author
- SCHWARZENBERGER, F.
- ORCID
- SCHWARZENBERGER, F.
- Venue
- International Zoo Yearbook
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2007-07
- Volume
- 41
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 52-74
- ISSN
- 0074-9664 (ISSN-L)
- 1748-1090
- OpenAlex
- W2004787678
- Cited by
- 254
- References
- 3
- Citations by year
- 2026: 8 · 2025: 31 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 12 · 2022: 12 · 2021: 17 · 2020: 11 · 2019: 13 · 2018: 10 · 2017: 16 · 2016: 9 · 2015: 14 · 2014: 17 · 2013: 19 · 2012: 19
- FWCI
- 13.08
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- International Zoo Yearbook (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Veterinary › Small Animals › Animal Behavior and Welfare Studies
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Wildlife Ecology and Conservation
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Primate Behavior and Ecology
- Keywords
- zoo animals, captive wildlife, wildlife, estrogen, androgens, progestogens, glucocorticoids, adrenal cortex hormones, reproductive hormones, assay validation, animal health, stress
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review