The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Repeated measurements of cerebral blood flow in rats. Comparisons between the hydrogen clearance method and laser Doppler flowmetry
Abstract
Changes in cerebral blood flow (CBF), in chloralose‐anaesthetized spontaneously hypertensive rats, were measured simultaneously with the hydrogen clearance (HC) method and Laser Doppler flowmetry (LDFM) in order to examine the correlation between results obtained with the two techniques. To induce changes in CBF the rats were bled and CBF measured at different levels of mean arterial pressure. As would be expected, with the platinum electrode at the depth of about I mm in the somatosensory cortex, HC gave biexponential curves reflecting clearance in two distinct compartmenrs. During control situation the HC method gave the following values (mean ± SE, n= 20, mlmin‐' 100g‐1): fast (fCBF) 158.6 ± 11.5, slow (sCBF) 29.1 ± 1.6 with a weighted mean flow (mCBF) of 83.3 ± 7.4. These fCBF and sCBF values correspond well to those of others obtained with [14 C]iodoantipyrine autoradiography in the cerebral cortex and corpus callosum, and better than the results of other studies using HC in rats. Our results, comparing data from HC and LDFM, show a linear relationship between relative values of blood flow changes, the coefficients being 0.658, 0.876 and 0.878 for the correlation between the LDFM data and relative changes in fCBF, sCBF and mCBF, respectively. All three regression lines were significantly different from the line of identity. Much of the discrepancy between the two methods may be related to limitations inherent in each of them, despite efforts to minimize their effects. Thus the depth sensitivity of LDFM in the brain may be greater than expected. In conclusion, the laser Doppler method seems, nevertheless, to be most useful for continuous estimations of changes in cerebral blood flow.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Non-invasive optical spectroscopy and imaging of human brain function
Villringer, A., & Chance, B. (1997) · Trends in Neurosciences · doi:10.1016/s0166-2236(97)01132-6 · Cited by 1,618
Monitoring of autoregulation using laser Doppler flowmetry in patients with head injury
Lam, J. M. K., Hsiang, J. N. K., & Poon, W. S. (1997) · Journal of Neurosurgery · doi:10.3171/jns.1997.86.3.0438 · Cited by 150
Metadata
- Authors
- SKARPHEDINSSON, J. O., HÅRDING, H., & THORÉN, P.
- Venue
- Acta Physiologica Scandinavica
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 1988-09
- Volume
- 134
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 133-142
- ISSN
- 0001-6772 (ISSN-L)
- 1365-201X
- OpenAlex
- W2014244937
- Cited by
- 163
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 5.47
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Repeated measurements of cerebral blood flow in rats. Comparisons between the hydrogen clearance method and laser Doppler flowmetry. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1748-1716.1988.tb08469.x
- The paper
- SKARPHEDINSSON, J. O., HÅRDING, H., & THORÉN, P. (1988). Repeated measurements of cerebral blood flow in rats. Comparisons between the hydrogen clearance method and laser Doppler flowmetry. Acta Physiologica Scandinavica. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1748-1716.1988.tb08469.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.