Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 163

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Repeated measurements of cerebral blood flow in rats. Comparisons between the hydrogen clearance method and laser Doppler flowmetry

SKARPHEDINSSON, J. O., HÅRDING, H., THORÉN, P.·1988·Acta Physiologica Scandinavica

Abstract

Changes in cerebral blood flow (CBF), in chloralose‐anaesthetized spontaneously hypertensive rats, were measured simultaneously with the hydrogen clearance (HC) method and Laser Doppler flowmetry (LDFM) in order to examine the correlation between results obtained with the two techniques. To induce changes in CBF the rats were bled and CBF measured at different levels of mean arterial pressure. As would be expected, with the platinum electrode at the depth of about I mm in the somatosensory cortex, HC gave biexponential curves reflecting clearance in two distinct compartmenrs. During control situation the HC method gave the following values (mean ± SE, n= 20, mlmin‐' 100g‐1): fast (fCBF) 158.6 ± 11.5, slow (sCBF) 29.1 ± 1.6 with a weighted mean flow (mCBF) of 83.3 ± 7.4. These fCBF and sCBF values correspond well to those of others obtained with [14 C]iodoantipyrine autoradiography in the cerebral cortex and corpus callosum, and better than the results of other studies using HC in rats. Our results, comparing data from HC and LDFM, show a linear relationship between relative values of blood flow changes, the coefficients being 0.658, 0.876 and 0.878 for the correlation between the LDFM data and relative changes in fCBF, sCBF and mCBF, respectively. All three regression lines were significantly different from the line of identity. Much of the discrepancy between the two methods may be related to limitations inherent in each of them, despite efforts to minimize their effects. Thus the depth sensitivity of LDFM in the brain may be greater than expected. In conclusion, the laser Doppler method seems, nevertheless, to be most useful for continuous estimations of changes in cerebral blood flow.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1748-1716.1988.tb08469.x

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 163

Metadata

Authors
SKARPHEDINSSON, J. O., HÅRDING, H., & THORÉN, P.
Venue
Acta Physiologica Scandinavica
Publisher
Wiley
Published
1988-09
Volume
134
Issue
1
Pages
133-142
ISSN
  • 0001-6772 (ISSN-L)
  • 1365-201X
OpenAlex
W2014244937
Cited by
163
References
0
FWCI
5.47
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Repeated measurements of cerebral blood flow in rats. Comparisons between the hydrogen clearance method and laser Doppler flowmetry. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1748-1716.1988.tb08469.x
The paper
SKARPHEDINSSON, J. O., HÅRDING, H., & THORÉN, P. (1988). Repeated measurements of cerebral blood flow in rats. Comparisons between the hydrogen clearance method and laser Doppler flowmetry. Acta Physiologica Scandinavica. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1748-1716.1988.tb08469.x

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.