The DOI matches its Crossref record; 74 of the 74 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The spinal pathophysiology of spasticity – from a basic science point of view
Abstract
Spasticity is a term, which was introduced to describe the velocity‐sensitive increased resistance of a limb to manipulation in subjects with lesions of descending motor pathways. This distinguishes spasticity from the changes in passive muscle properties, which are often seen in these patients, but are not velocity‐sensitive. Increased excitability of the stretch reflex is thus a central component of the definition of spasticity. This review describes changes in cellular properties and transmission in a number of spinal reflex pathways, which may explain the increased stretch reflex excitability. The review focuses mainly on results derived from the use of non‐invasive electrophysiological techniques, which have been developed during the past 20–30 years to investigate spinal neuronal networks in human subjects, but work from animal models is also considered. The reflex hyperexcitability develops over several months following the primary lesion and involves adaptation in the spinal neuronal circuitries caudal to the lesion. In animal models, changes in cellular properties (such as ‘plateau potentials’) have been reported, but the relevance of these changes to human spasticity has not been clarified. In humans, numerous studies have suggested that reduction of spinal inhibitory mechanisms (in particular that of disynaptic reciprocal inhibition) is involved. The inter‐subject variability of these mechanisms and the lack of objective quantitative measures of spasticity have impeded disclosure of a clear causal relationship between the alterations in the inhibitory mechanisms and the stretch reflex hyperexcitability. Techniques which make such a quantitative measure possible as well as longitudinal studies where development of reflex excitability and changes in the inhibitory mechanisms are followed over time are in great demand.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Short-Term Synaptic Plasticity
Zucker, R. S., & Regehr, W. G. (2002) · Annual Review of Physiology · doi:10.1146/annurev.physiol.64.092501.114547 · Cited by 5,068
The injured spinal cord spontaneously forms a new intraspinal circuit in adult rats
Bareyre, F. M., Kerschensteiner, M., Raineteau, O., Mettenleiter, T. C., Weinmann, O., & Schwab, M. E. (2004) · Nature Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/nn1195 · Cited by 1,086
Neuronal plasticity in the septal nuclei of the adult rat
Raisman, G. (1969) · Brain Research · doi:10.1016/0006-8993(69)90029-8 · Cited by 824
Plasticity of motor systems after incomplete spinal cord injury
Raineteau, O., & Schwab, M. E. (2001) · Nature Reviews Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/35067570 · Cited by 803
Presynaptic inhibition in the vertebrate spinal cord revisited
Rudomin, P., & Schmidt, R. F. (1999) · Experimental Brain Research · doi:10.1007/s002210050933 · Cited by 737
Sommerfeld, D. K., Eek, E. U.-B., Svensson, A.-K., Holmqvist, L. W., & von Arbin, M. H. (2004) · Stroke · doi:10.1161/01.str.0000105386.05173.5e · Cited by 724
Integration in Spinal Neuronal Systems
Baldissera, F., Hultborn, H., & Illert, M. (1981) · Comprehensive Physiology · doi:10.1002/cphy.cp010212 · Cited by 675
Self-citationPathophysiology of spastic paresis. I: Paresis and soft tissue changes
Gracies, J. (2005) · Muscle & Nerve · doi:10.1002/mus.20284 · Cited by 658
Synaptic Control of Motoneuronal Excitability
Rekling, J. C., Funk, G. D., Bayliss, D. A., Dong, X.-W., & Feldman, J. L. (2000) · Physiological Reviews · doi:10.1152/physrev.2000.80.2.767 · Cited by 607
Synaptic action during and after repetitive stimulation
Curtis, D. R., & Eccles, J. C. (1960) · The Journal of Physiology · doi:10.1113/jphysiol.1960.sp006393 · Cited by 554
Cited by
Motor compensation and its effects on neural reorganization after stroke
Jones, T. A. (2017) · Nature Reviews Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/nrn.2017.26 · Cited by 377
Spasticity, Motor Recovery, and Neural Plasticity after Stroke
Li, S. (2017) · Frontiers in Neurology · doi:10.3389/fneur.2017.00120 · Cited by 336
Recovery of Locomotion After Spinal Cord Injury: Some Facts and Mechanisms
Rossignol, S., & Frigon, A. (2011) · Annual Review of Neuroscience · doi:10.1146/annurev-neuro-061010-113746 · Cited by 320
Spasticity Mechanisms – for the Clinician
Mukherjee, A., & Chakravarty, A. (2010) · Frontiers in Neurology · doi:10.3389/fneur.2010.00149 · Cited by 289
New insights into the pathophysiology of post-stroke spasticity
Li, S., & Francisco, G. E. (2015) · Frontiers in Human Neuroscience · doi:10.3389/fnhum.2015.00192 · Cited by 254
Metadata
- Authors
- Nielsen, J. B., Crone, C., & Hultborn, H.
- Venue
- Acta Physiologica
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2007-01-23
- Volume
- 189
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 171-180
- ISSN
- 1748-1708 (ISSN-L)
- 1748-1716
- OpenAlex
- W2083296081
- Cited by
- 431
- References
- 74
- FWCI
- 11.26
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The spinal pathophysiology of spasticity – from a basic science point of view. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1748-1716.2006.01652.x
- The paper
- Nielsen, J. B., Crone, C., & Hultborn, H. (2007). The spinal pathophysiology of spasticity – from a basic science point of view. Acta Physiologica. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1748-1716.2006.01652.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.