The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
FORAGING STRATEGIES OF SYMPATRIC KILLER WHALE (ORCINUS ORCA) POPULATIONS IN PRINCE WILLIAM SOUND, ALASKA
Abstract
Killer whales (Orcinus orca) feed on a wide variety of fish, cephalopods, and marine mammals throughout their cosmopolitan range; however, the dietary breadth that characterizes the species is not reflected in all populations. Here, we present the findings of a 14‐yr study of the diet and feeding habits of killer whales in Prince William Sound, Alaska. Two non‐associating forms of killer whale, termed resident and transient (Bigg et al. 1987), were identified. All prey seen taken by transients were marine mammals, including harbor seals (Phoca vitulina), Dall's porpoises (Phocoenoides dalli), Steller sea lions (Eumetopias jubatus), and harbor porpoises (Phocoena phocoena). Resident killer whales appeared to prey principally on salmon (Oncorhynchus spp.), preferring coho salmon (O. kisutch) over other, more abundant salmon species. Pacific herring (Clupea pallasi) and Pacific halibut (Hippocampus stenolepis) were also taken. Resident killer whales frequently were seen to interact in non‐predatory ways with Steller sea lions and Dall's porpoises, while transients were not. Differences in the social organization and behavior of the resident and transient killer whales in Prince William Sound are discussed in the light of the dietary differences documented here.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Observational study of behavior: sampling methods
Altmann, J. (1974) · Behaviour · doi:10.1163/156853974x00534 · Cited by 13,891
Cited by
Sequential megafaunal collapse in the North Pacific Ocean: An ongoing legacy of industrial whaling?
Springer, A. M., Estes, J. A., van Vliet, G. B., Williams, T. M., Doak, D. F., Danner, E. M., Forney, K. A., & Pfister, B. (2003) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1635156100 · Cited by 516
Yurk, H., Barrett-Lennard, L., Ford, J. K. B., & Matkin, C. O. (2002) · Animal Behaviour · doi:10.1006/anbe.2002.3012 · Cited by 256
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Saulitis, E., Matkin, C., Barrett‐Lennard, L., Heise, K., & Ellis, G.
- Venue
- Marine Mammal Science
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2000-01
- Volume
- 16
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 94-109
- ISSN
- 0824-0469 (ISSN-L)
- 1748-7692
- OpenAlex
- W2144742292
- Cited by
- 210
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 7.19
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: FORAGING STRATEGIES OF SYMPATRIC KILLER WHALE (ORCINUS ORCA) POPULATIONS IN PRINCE WILLIAM SOUND, ALASKA. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1748-7692.2000.tb00906.x
- The paper
- Saulitis, E., Matkin, C., Barrett‐Lennard, L., Heise, K., & Ellis, G. (2000). FORAGING STRATEGIES OF SYMPATRIC KILLER WHALE (ORCINUS ORCA) POPULATIONS IN PRINCE WILLIAM SOUND, ALASKA. Marine Mammal Science. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1748-7692.2000.tb00906.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.