CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 80Sepsis Diagnosis and TreatmentTrauma, Hemostasis, Coagulopathy, ResuscitationImmune Response and Inflammation

The bacterial factor in traumatic shock

Fine, Jacob, Frank, Howard, Schweinburg, Fritz, Jacob, Stanley, Gordon, Theodore·1952·Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences
DOI 10.1111/j.1749-6632.1952.tb26558.x
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1749-6632.1952.tb26558.x

Cites

13 of 13 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • During severe systemic illness such as sepsis or haemorrhagic shock, the bacterial content of the gut determines the severity of systemic injury.

    “During severe systemic illness, such as sepsis or haemorrhagic shock, the bacterial content of the gut determines the severity of systemic injury”

    From The microbiome and critical illness (2016) · cites this paper as [87]

  • The relation between gut bacterial burden and systemic injury in shock has been reported consistently across species, types of shock, and decades of rigorous inquiry.

    “This relation has been reported consistently across species (mice,90,93 rats,94 rabbits,89 and dogs87), types of shock (haemorrhage,87 sepsis,89 and ischaemia–reperfusion90), and decades of rigorous inquiry.”

    From The microbiome and critical illness (2016) · cites this paper as [87]

  • When the bacterial burden of the gut is minimised, either by pretreatment with enteric antibiotics or by use of germ-free animals, the inflammation and injury sustained by distal organs in shock is lessened.

    “When the bacterial burden of the gut is minimised, either by pretreatment with enteric antibiotics or by use of germ-free animals, the inflammation and injury sustained by distal organs in shock is lessened.”

    From The microbiome and critical illness (2016) · cites this paper as [87]

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Related

Authors
Fine, J., Frank, H., Schweinburg, F., Jacob, S., & Gordon, T.
Affiliations
Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center (US)
ORCID
Venue
Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences
Publisher
Wiley
Published
1952-09
Volume
55
Issue
3
Pages
429-445
ISSN
  • 0077-8923 (ISSN-L)
  • 1749-6632
DOI
10.1111/j.1749-6632.1952.tb26558.x
OpenAlex
W2045063368
Cited by
80
References
13
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 2 · 2020: 1 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 1
FWCI
16.32
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Licence
onlinelibrary.wiley.com/termsAndConditions#vor (vor, 19828 d)
Locations
  • Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Sepsis Diagnosis and Treatment
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine › Trauma, Hemostasis, Coagulopathy, Resuscitation
  • Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Immunology › Immune Response and Inflammation
Keywords
traumatic shock, bacterial factors, sepsis, shock pathogenesis, bacterial toxins
MeSH terms
Shock, Shock, Traumatic, Wounds and Injuries

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review