The control of deviant behavior in chronically disturbed psychotic patients by the oral administration of reserpine
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Cited by
Sorted by citations
The role and interpretation of pilot studies in clinical research
Leon, A. C., Davis, L. L., & Kraemer, H. C. (2011) · Journal of Psychiatric Research · doi:10.1016/j.jpsychires.2010.10.008 · Cited by 1,917 · see citing works
Glutamate and dopamine in schizophrenia: An update for the 21 <sup>st</sup> century
Howes, O., McCutcheon, R., & Stone, J. (2015) · Journal of Psychopharmacology · doi:10.1177/0269881114563634 · Cited by 702 · see citing works
A controlled trial of reserpine in chronic schizophrenia
Goller, E. S. (1960) · Journal of Mental Science · doi:10.1192/bjp.106.445.1408 · Cited by 9 · see citing works
- Authors
- Campden‐Main, B. C., & Wegielski, Z.
- Affiliations
- Central State Hospital (US)
- Venue
- Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 1955-04
- Volume
- 61
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 117-122
- ISSN
- 0077-8923 (ISSN-L)
- 1749-6632
- OpenAlex
- W2134894679
- Cited by
- 14
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2025: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 1 · 2015: 1
- FWCI
- 8.04
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Schizophrenia research and treatment
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Historical Psychiatry and Medical Practices
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychopathy, Forensic Psychiatry, Sexual Offending
- Keywords
- reserpine, chronic psychosis, deviance, oral administration, antipsychotic drugs, behavioral control
- MeSH terms
- Administration, Oral, Antihypertensive Agents, Mental Disorders, Psychotic Disorders, Reserpine, Secologanin Tryptamine Alkaloids
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
