The DOI matches its Crossref record.
PHYSIOLOGICAL RESPONSE TO CRYSTALLOID RESUSCITATION OF SEVERE BURNS
Abstract
Summary: The use of balanced salt solutions in the resuscitation of burn shock has been evaluated in experimental animals and clinical burns utilizing the maintenance of functional ECF volume and circulatory response as the criteria of effectiveness. In both animal and clinical burns restoration of the functional ECF required greater quantities administered at a faster rate than was anticipated. In the first 24–30 hr post‐burn, circulatory hemodynamics appear to be closely correlated with functional ECF volume maintenance. After this time, changes in the circulatory status seem to be unrelated to fluid administration.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
The Phenomenon of “Fluid Creep” in Acute Burn Resuscitation
Saffle, J. R. (2007) · Journal of Burn Care & Research · doi:10.1097/bcr.0b013e318053d3a1 · Cited by 326
Peeters, Y., Vandervelden, S., Wise, R., & Malbrain, M. L. N. G. (2015) · Anestezjologia Intensywna Terapia · doi:10.5603/ait.a2015.0063 · Cited by 33
Metadata
- Authors
- Baxter, C. R., & Shires, T.
- Venue
- Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 1968-08
- Volume
- 150
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 874-894
- ISSN
- 0077-8923 (ISSN-L)
- 1749-6632
- OpenAlex
- W2020051827
- Cited by
- 530
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 2.65
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: PHYSIOLOGICAL RESPONSE TO CRYSTALLOID RESUSCITATION OF SEVERE BURNS. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1749-6632.1968.tb14738.x
- The paper
- Baxter, C. R., & Shires, T. (1968). PHYSIOLOGICAL RESPONSE TO CRYSTALLOID RESUSCITATION OF SEVERE BURNS. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1749-6632.1968.tb14738.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
