Cited by 122EFL/ESL Teaching and LearningSecond Language Acquisition and LearningLinguistics and Language Analysis

SECOND‐LANGUAGE ACQUISITION FROM A FUNCTIONALIST PERSPECTIVE: PRAGMATIC, SEMANTIC, AND PERCEPTUAL STRATEGIES*

Bates, Elizabeth, MacWhinney, Brian·1981·Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1749-6632.1981.tb42009.x

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Bates, E., & MacWhinney, B.
Affiliations
  • University of Colorado Boulder (US)
  • Carnegie Mellon University (US)
Venue
Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences
Publisher
Wiley
Published
1981-12
Volume
379
Issue
1
Pages
190-214
ISSN
  • 0077-8923 (ISSN-L)
  • 1749-6632
OpenAlex
W2144819516
Cited by
122
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 4
FWCI
8.49
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Language and Linguistics › EFL/ESL Teaching and Learning
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Second Language Acquisition and Learning
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Language and Linguistics › Linguistics and Language Analysis
Keywords
second language acquisition, functionalism, pragmatic strategies, semantic strategies, perceptual strategies, language learning

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review