Cited by 116

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Uterine Receptivity for Blastocyst Implantation

YOSHINAGA, KOJI·1988·Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences

Abstract

The receptivity for blastocyst implantation is controlled by progesterone and in some species by the synergistic action of progesterone and estrogen. The duration of the receptive phase, the so-called "window," is short in rodents (less than 24 hours) and may be three days in the primate. Once the uterus becomes receptive, it automatically becomes refractory at the end of the receptive phase. The uterus in the refractory phase can be toxic to the blastocyst in small laboratory animals. The endometrium of the receptive uterus may be characterized by the following parameters: (1) Formation of bulbous protrusions on the apical surface of the luminal epithelium; (2) Secretion of the stage-specific glycoproteins by the luminal epithelium; (3) Readiness of stromal cells to decidualize when appropriate stimulation is applied; and (4) Reorganization and changes of stromal extracellular matrix components so that stromal cells are conditioned for decidualization, and after decidualization the appearance of basement membrane components in the matrix.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1749-6632.1988.tb22279.x

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In laboratory animals, there are three phases of endometrial development after ovulation: neutral, receptive, and resistant.

    “In laboratory animals, there are three phases of endometrial development after ovulation: the uterine lining is initially neutral toward the implanting blastocyst, then receptive, and finally resistant.20,21”

    From Time of Implantation of the Conceptus and Loss of Pregnancy (1999) · cites this paper as [21]

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 48

  1. 10.1002/jez.1401140110 · DOI
  2. 10.1530/jrf.0.0010197 · DOI
  3. 10.1016/S0015-0282(16)34803-8 · DOI
  4. Psychoyos A., 1966, Ciba Foundation Study Group, 4
  5. 10.1007/978-1-4613-3180-3_25 · DOI
  6. 10.1530/jrf.0.0260099 · DOI
  7. Adams C. E., 1982, Mammalian egg transfer
  8. Hodgen G. D., 1983, Surrogate embryo transfer combined with estrogen‐progesterone therapy in monkeys. Implantation, gestation, and delivery without ovaries, J. Am. Med. Assoc., 250, 2167, 10.1001/jama.1983.03340160053031 · DOI
  9. 10.1111/j.1749-6632.1986.tb20923.x · DOI
  10. Yoshinaga K., 1977, International Review of Physiology. Reproductive Physiology II, 201
  11. Meyer R. K., 1969, Recent Advances in Primatology. Proceedings of the Second International Congress of Primatology: 30–35
  12. 10.1530/jrf.0.0020035 · DOI
  13. Psychoyos A., 1962, Production experimentale des superimplantations ovulairs chez le rat, C. R. Acad. Sci., 254, 1504
  14. 10.1210/endo-88-3-627 · DOI
  15. 10.1016/S0015-0282(16)30062-0 · DOI
  16. 10.1002/aja.1001730302 · DOI
  17. 10.1007/BF00521117 · DOI
  18. 10.1530/jrf.0.0210037 · DOI
  19. Psychoyos A., 1971, Etude de la surface de l'epithelium uterin au microscope electronique a balayage. Observations chez la ratte au 4 et au 5 jour de la gestation, C. R. Acad. Sci. D., 272, 2723
  20. Nilsson B. O., 1980, Prog. Reprod. Biol., 70
  21. 10.1095/biolreprod11.2.220 · DOI
  22. 10.1016/0014-4827(74)90360-7 · DOI
  23. 10.1002/ar.1091800105 · DOI
  24. 10.1016/0014-4827(77)90185-9 · DOI
  25. 10.1002/aja.1001590106 · DOI
  26. 10.1095/biolreprod27.2.485 · DOI
  27. 10.1016/0012-1606(84)90020-4 · DOI
  28. 10.1002/aja.1001710308 · DOI
  29. 10.1007/BF00214246 · DOI
  30. 10.1530/jrf.0.0750475 · DOI
  31. 10.1095/biolreprod34.4.701 · DOI
  32. Anderson T. L., 1986, Molecular evidence for the window of uterine receptivity to implantation in the cycling nonhuman primate, J. Cell Biol. (Abstr. #1729.), 103, 463a
  33. 10.1002/jez.1402220211 · DOI
  34. 10.1007/978-3-662-07788-7 · DOI
  35. 10.1002/ar.1091040307 · DOI
  36. 10.1016/S0083-6729(08)60077-1 · DOI
  37. 10.1095/biolreprod21.5.1169 · DOI
  38. 10.1095/biolreprod31.3.505 · DOI
  39. 10.1016/0090-6980(86)90042-0 · DOI
  40. 10.1016/0262-1746(87)90011-4 · DOI
  41. 10.1530/jrf.0.0710057 · DOI
  42. 10.1083/jcb.94.3.597 · DOI
  43. Wewer U. M., 1985, Immunochemical and ultrastructural assessment of the nature of the periceilular basement membrane of human decidual cells, Lab. Invest., 53, 624
  44. 10.1111/j.1432-0436.1986.tb00555.x · DOI
  45. Sutherland A. E., 1986, Role of 140 Kd glycoproteins in spreading of mouse blastocysts on fibronectin and laminin, J. Cell Biol. (Abstr. #1069.), 103, 287a
  46. Liotta L. A., 1986, Tumor invasion and metastases–role of the extracellular matrix: Rhoads Memorial Award Lecture, Cancer Res., 46, 1
  47. 10.1002/ar.1092120107 · DOI
  48. Short R. V., 1967, Hormonal influence on tumour growth in the uterus of the rat, J. Reprod. Fertil., 14, 284

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
YOSHINAGA, K.
Venue
Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences
Publisher
Wiley
Published
1988-10
Volume
541
Issue
1
Pages
424-431
ISSN
  • 0077-8923
  • 1749-6632
Cited by
116
References
0
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review