The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Uterine Receptivity for Blastocyst Implantation
Abstract
The receptivity for blastocyst implantation is controlled by progesterone and in some species by the synergistic action of progesterone and estrogen. The duration of the receptive phase, the so-called "window," is short in rodents (less than 24 hours) and may be three days in the primate. Once the uterus becomes receptive, it automatically becomes refractory at the end of the receptive phase. The uterus in the refractory phase can be toxic to the blastocyst in small laboratory animals. The endometrium of the receptive uterus may be characterized by the following parameters: (1) Formation of bulbous protrusions on the apical surface of the luminal epithelium; (2) Secretion of the stage-specific glycoproteins by the luminal epithelium; (3) Readiness of stromal cells to decidualize when appropriate stimulation is applied; and (4) Reorganization and changes of stromal extracellular matrix components so that stromal cells are conditioned for decidualization, and after decidualization the appearance of basement membrane components in the matrix.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In laboratory animals, there are three phases of endometrial development after ovulation: neutral, receptive, and resistant.
“In laboratory animals, there are three phases of endometrial development after ovulation: the uterine lining is initially neutral toward the implanting blastocyst, then receptive, and finally resistant.20,21”
From Time of Implantation of the Conceptus and Loss of Pregnancy (1999) · cites this paper as [21]
Citations
Cites
No references could be resolved yet.
Research works printed but not linked: 48
- 10.1002/jez.1401140110 · DOI
- 10.1530/jrf.0.0010197 · DOI
- 10.1016/S0015-0282(16)34803-8 · DOI
- Psychoyos A., 1966, Ciba Foundation Study Group, 4
- 10.1007/978-1-4613-3180-3_25 · DOI
- 10.1530/jrf.0.0260099 · DOI
- Adams C. E., 1982, Mammalian egg transfer
- Hodgen G. D., 1983, Surrogate embryo transfer combined with estrogen‐progesterone therapy in monkeys. Implantation, gestation, and delivery without ovaries, J. Am. Med. Assoc., 250, 2167, 10.1001/jama.1983.03340160053031 · DOI
- 10.1111/j.1749-6632.1986.tb20923.x · DOI
- Yoshinaga K., 1977, International Review of Physiology. Reproductive Physiology II, 201
- Meyer R. K., 1969, Recent Advances in Primatology. Proceedings of the Second International Congress of Primatology: 30–35
- 10.1530/jrf.0.0020035 · DOI
- Psychoyos A., 1962, Production experimentale des superimplantations ovulairs chez le rat, C. R. Acad. Sci., 254, 1504
- 10.1210/endo-88-3-627 · DOI
- 10.1016/S0015-0282(16)30062-0 · DOI
- 10.1002/aja.1001730302 · DOI
- 10.1007/BF00521117 · DOI
- 10.1530/jrf.0.0210037 · DOI
- Psychoyos A., 1971, Etude de la surface de l'epithelium uterin au microscope electronique a balayage. Observations chez la ratte au 4 et au 5 jour de la gestation, C. R. Acad. Sci. D., 272, 2723
- Nilsson B. O., 1980, Prog. Reprod. Biol., 70
- 10.1095/biolreprod11.2.220 · DOI
- 10.1016/0014-4827(74)90360-7 · DOI
- 10.1002/ar.1091800105 · DOI
- 10.1016/0014-4827(77)90185-9 · DOI
- 10.1002/aja.1001590106 · DOI
- 10.1095/biolreprod27.2.485 · DOI
- 10.1016/0012-1606(84)90020-4 · DOI
- 10.1002/aja.1001710308 · DOI
- 10.1007/BF00214246 · DOI
- 10.1530/jrf.0.0750475 · DOI
- 10.1095/biolreprod34.4.701 · DOI
- Anderson T. L., 1986, Molecular evidence for the window of uterine receptivity to implantation in the cycling nonhuman primate, J. Cell Biol. (Abstr. #1729.), 103, 463a
- 10.1002/jez.1402220211 · DOI
- 10.1007/978-3-662-07788-7 · DOI
- 10.1002/ar.1091040307 · DOI
- 10.1016/S0083-6729(08)60077-1 · DOI
- 10.1095/biolreprod21.5.1169 · DOI
- 10.1095/biolreprod31.3.505 · DOI
- 10.1016/0090-6980(86)90042-0 · DOI
- 10.1016/0262-1746(87)90011-4 · DOI
- 10.1530/jrf.0.0710057 · DOI
- 10.1083/jcb.94.3.597 · DOI
- Wewer U. M., 1985, Immunochemical and ultrastructural assessment of the nature of the periceilular basement membrane of human decidual cells, Lab. Invest., 53, 624
- 10.1111/j.1432-0436.1986.tb00555.x · DOI
- Sutherland A. E., 1986, Role of 140 Kd glycoproteins in spreading of mouse blastocysts on fibronectin and laminin, J. Cell Biol. (Abstr. #1069.), 103, 287a
- Liotta L. A., 1986, Tumor invasion and metastases–role of the extracellular matrix: Rhoads Memorial Award Lecture, Cancer Res., 46, 1
- 10.1002/ar.1092120107 · DOI
- Short R. V., 1967, Hormonal influence on tumour growth in the uterus of the rat, J. Reprod. Fertil., 14, 284
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Time of Implantation of the Conceptus and Loss of Pregnancy
Wilcox, A. J., Baird, D. D., & Weinberg, C. R. (1999) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejm199906103402304 · Cited by 1,081
Endometrial receptivity markers, the journey to successful embryo implantation.
Achache, H., & Revel, A. (2006) · Human Reproduction Update · doi:10.1093/humupd/dml004 · Cited by 952
Embryonic diapause: Development on hold
Fenelon, J. C., Banerjee, A., & Murphy, B. D. (2014) · The International Journal of Developmental Biology · doi:10.1387/ijdb.140074bm · Cited by 147
Cheon, Y.-P., Xu, X., Bagchi, M. K., & Bagchi, I. C. (2003) · Endocrinology · doi:10.1210/en.2003-0585 · Cited by 76
Metadata
- Authors
- YOSHINAGA, K.
- Venue
- Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 1988-10
- Volume
- 541
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 424-431
- ISSN
- 0077-8923
- 1749-6632
- Cited by
- 116
- References
- 0
- Language
- en
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review