Cited by 3Biblical Studies and InterpretationHistorical Astronomy and Related StudiesHistorical, Religious, and Philosophical Studies

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Calendrical Texts and the Origins of the Dead Sea Scroll Community

VANDERKAM, JAMES C.·1994·Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1749-6632.1994.tb30482.x

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The dwqh cycles were initially calculated for a triennial lunar cycle rather than a six-year span, and upon expansion to a six-year framework the triennial scheme was duplicated without re-evaluating the lunar phenomena.

    “A straightforward explanation for the discrepancies observed could be that the dwqh cycles were initially calculated for a triennial lunar cycle rather than a six-year span, which from a calendrical perspective was constructed only in order to enumerate the weeks of the priestly families before Gamul returns to the temple on the first week of the first month. Upon its expansion to a six-year”
  • Upon its expansion to a six-year framework, the scheme of the triennial cycle was merely duplicated without re-evaluating the dynamics of the lunar phenomena.

    “Upon its expansion to a six-year framework, the scheme of the triennial cycle was merely duplicated without re-evaluating the dynamics of the lunar phenomena.52”
  • VanderKam's hypothesis gained popularity in terms of Qumran history because it was concurrent with mainstream theories on the formation of the yahad.

    “VanderKam's hypothesis gained popularity in terms of Qumran history because it was concurrent with mainstream theories on the formation of the yahad (VanderKam 1994: 385;1998: 113-16).”

    From Qumran Calendars: A Survey of Scholarship 1980—2007 (2008) · cites this paper as VanderKam 1994: 385

Citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
VANDERKAM, J. C.
Affiliations
University of Notre Dame (US)
Corresponding author
VANDERKAM, JAMES C.
Venue
Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences
Publisher
Wiley
Published
1994-06
Volume
722
Issue
1
Pages
371-388
ISSN
  • 0077-8923 (ISSN-L)
  • 1749-6632
OpenAlex
W2072798256
Cited by
3
References
0
Citations by year
2025: 1
FWCI
0.00
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Religious studies › Biblical Studies and Interpretation
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Historical Astronomy and Related Studies
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Religious studies › Historical, Religious, and Philosophical Studies
Keywords
Dead Sea Scrolls, Qumran community, Jewish calendar, Second Temple Judaism

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review