Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 250

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

The Bed Nucleus of the Stria Terminalis: A Target Site for Noradrenergic Actions in Opiate Withdrawal

ASTON‐JONES, GARY, DELFS, JILL M., DRUHAN, JONATHAN, ZHU, YAN·1999·Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences

Abstract

ABSTRACT: Hyperactivity of brain norepinephrine (NE) systems has long been implicated in mechanisms of opiate withdrawal (OW). However, little is known about where elevated NE may act to promote OW. Here we report that the bed nucleus of the stria terminalis (BNST), the densest NE target in the brain, is critical for NE actions in OW. (1) Many BNST neurons become Fos+ after OW. Pretreatment with the β antagonist, propranolol, markedly reduces OW symptoms and the number of Fos+ cells in the BNST. (2) Numerous neurons in the nucleus tractus solitarius (A2 neurons) and the A1 cell group are triple labeled for tyrosine hydroxylase, a retrograde tracer from the BNST, and Fos after OW, revealing numerous NE neurons that project to the BNST from the medulla that are stimulated by OW. Fewer such triple‐labeled neurons were found in the locus caeruleus. (3) Behavioral studies reveal that local microinjections of selective β‐adrenergic antagonists into the BNST attenuate OW symptoms. In particular, withdrawal‐induced place aversion is abolished by bilateral microinjection of a cocktail of selective beta 1 (betaxolol) plus the beta 2 (ICI 181,555) antagonists (1.0 nmol each/0.5 μL per side) into the BNST. Similar results were obtained with neurochemically selective lesions of the ventral ascending NE bundle, the pathway for A1 and A2 projections to the BNST. Similar lesions of the dorsal NE bundle of projections from the locus caeruleus had no effect on either aversive or somatic withdrawal symptoms. Together, these results indicate that β‐receptor activation in the BNST is critical for aversive withdrawal symptoms, and that A1 and A2 neurons in the medulla are the source of this critical NE.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1749-6632.1999.tb09284.x

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 250

Metadata

Authors
ASTON‐JONES, G., DELFS, J. M., DRUHAN, J., & ZHU, Y.
Venue
Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences
Publisher
Wiley
Published
1999-06
Volume
877
Issue
1
Pages
486-498
ISSN
  • 0077-8923 (ISSN-L)
  • 1749-6632
OpenAlex
W2148525960
Cited by
250
References
4
FWCI
3.78
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The Bed Nucleus of the Stria Terminalis: A Target Site for Noradrenergic Actions in Opiate Withdrawal. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1749-6632.1999.tb09284.x
The paper
ASTON‐JONES, G., DELFS, J. M., DRUHAN, J., & ZHU, Y. (1999). The Bed Nucleus of the Stria Terminalis: A Target Site for Noradrenergic Actions in Opiate Withdrawal. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1749-6632.1999.tb09284.x

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.