Cited by 211Alzheimer's disease research and treatmentsDementia and Cognitive Impairment ResearchMemory and Neural Mechanisms

The Parahippocampal Gyrus in Alzheimer's Disease: Clinical and Preclinical Neuroanatomical Correlates

VAN HOESEN, GARY W., AUGUSTINACK, JEAN C., DIERKING, JASON, REDMAN, SARAH J., THANGAVEL, RAMASAMY·2000·Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences

Abstract

The human parahippocampal gyrus forms a large part of the limbic lobe along the ventromedial part of the temporal cortical mantle. It is a variable and complicated cortex in terms of structure, and the latter is aggravated further by interfaces with the anterior insula anteriorly and the cingulate gyrus and occipital lobe posteriorly. Additional complications relate to its lateral border with the temporal cortex and especially the sulcal configurations that define this junction. The rhinal sulcus, which separates parahippocampal and temporal cortices in other species, including the anthropoid apes, is either lacking or rudimentary in the human brain. Thus, defining this junction requires cytoarchitectural examination and precludes the use of mere inspection of sulcal existing patterns. The cortical areas that form the parahippocampal gyrus are vulnerable to pathological changes in Alzheimer's disease (AD), and its entorhinal and perirhinal subdivisions are both the most heavily damaged cortical areas and the focus for disease onset. The neurons that acquire neurofibrillary tangles (NFTs) occupy the junction of the isocortical mantle with the limbic cortical mantle, but share, or partially share, a vulnerability phenotype with large neurons in both domains. The differential expression of this phenotype across time creates the false impression of NFT spread in cross-sectional comparisons of AD brains. The questions of what this phenotype is and why it is expressed first in the…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1749-6632.2000.tb06731.x

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

No citation lists for this paper

No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.

References 69 · Cited by 211

Authors
VAN HOESEN, G. W., AUGUSTINACK, J. C., DIERKING, J., REDMAN, S. J., & THANGAVEL, R.
Affiliations
University of Iowa (US)
Venue
Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2000-06
Volume
911
Issue
1
Pages
254-274
ISSN
  • 0077-8923 (ISSN-L)
  • 1749-6632
OpenAlex
W2156676059
Cited by
211
References
69
Citations by year
2026: 8 · 2025: 18 · 2024: 22 · 2023: 19 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 10 · 2014: 9 · 2013: 9 · 2012: 11
FWCI
0.56
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health
  • National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (P0 NS 19632, R01NS014944, NS-14944)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Alzheimer's disease research and treatments
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory and Neural Mechanisms
Keywords
parahippocampal gyrus, Alzheimer's disease, entorhinal cortex, perirhinal cortex, neurofibrillary tangles, limbic lobe, temporal cortex, neuroanatomical correlates, disease onset, cytoarchitecture
MeSH terms
Alzheimer Disease, Animals, Humans, Terminology as Topic, Reference Values, Parahippocampal Gyrus

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review